When discussing the antonyms of double jeopardy, we must first understand the concept of double jeopardy. This legal principle protects individuals from being prosecuted twice for the same offense, ensuring they are not subjected to multiple trials for the same crime. The antonyms of double jeopardy, therefore, refer to situations where a person can face retrial or multiple prosecutions for a single offense.
In contrast to double jeopardy, where an individual is protected from being tried again for the same crime, its antonyms allow for the possibility of retrial or multiple prosecutions. These antonyms challenge the notion of finality in criminal proceedings and can result in defendants facing repeated legal action for the same alleged offense. By exploring the antonyms of double jeopardy, we gain insight into the complexities of legal proceedings and the potential for continued litigation beyond initial trials.
Understanding the antonyms of double jeopardy sheds light on the nuances of legal protections against repeated prosecutions. While double jeopardy safeguards individuals from being tried twice for the same offense, its antonyms highlight scenarios where such protections may not apply. By examining these antonyms, we can better comprehend the intricacies of legal proceedings and the potential implications for defendants facing retrial or multiple prosecutions.
Example Sentences With Opposite of Double Jeopardy
| Antonym | Sentence with Double Jeopardy | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Single | The defendant faced double jeopardy in the trial. | The defendant only had to face a single charge. |
| Safety | Putting someone in double jeopardy goes against safety regulations. | Ensuring safety means not subjecting anyone to double jeopardy. |
| Protection | The law is in place to prevent double jeopardy for any individual. | Legal safeguards ensure that no one faces protection. |
| Innocent | The suspect was acquitted to avoid double jeopardy. | The suspect was cleared as they were found to be innocent. |
| Advantage | Being accused of a crime twice gives the prosecution an advantage. | A fair trial prohibits the prosecution from gaining any advantage. |
| Secure | Exposing someone to double jeopardy doesn’t make them feel secure. | A single trial ensures that defendants feel more secure. |
| Fairness | Allowing double jeopardy does not promote fairness in the legal system. | Rejecting double jeopardy maintains fairness in legal proceedings. |
| Safety | Double jeopardy can put individuals at risk. | Removing double jeopardy ensures safety for all involved. |
| Exonerate | The defendant was found guilty due to double jeopardy. | The defendant was found innocent and exonerated from all charges. |
| Protect | Ensuring the defendant is protected from double jeopardy is essential. | Failing to protect the defendant exposes them to unnecessary risks. |
| Clear | A jury must clear the accused to avoid double jeopardy. | The accused was found guilty and not cleared of any charges. |
| Secure | The legal system should aim to make citizens feel secure, not subject them to double jeopardy. | Being subjected to double jeopardy undermines security in the legal system. |
| Justice | Upholding double jeopardy can hinder the path to justice. | Rejecting double jeopardy is essential for achieving true justice. |
| Deterrent | The presence of double jeopardy can be a deterrent for seeking justice. | Removing double jeopardy eliminates any deterrent for seeking justice. |
| Defend | A lawyer’s duty is to defend their client against double jeopardy. | A lawyer should ensure their client is not put in a position of needing defense against double jeopardy. |
| Convict | Double jeopardy prevents an individual from being wrongly convicted twice for the same crime. | Without double jeopardy, the risk of being wrongly convicted multiple times increases. |
| Relief | A verdict of not guilty brings relief to the defendant after facing double jeopardy. | The absence of double jeopardy ensures that a verdict of not guilty will be the ultimate relief. |
| Equitable | The legal system must ensure an equitable process and avoid double jeopardy. | Allowing double jeopardy undermines an equitable legal process. |
| Support | Victims need support to navigate the legal system and avoid double jeopardy. | Experiencing double jeopardy highlights the importance of support for each individual. |
| Guilt | Double jeopardy provides a safeguard against unjust guilt. | Allowing multiple trials risks unjust guilt. |
| Absolve | The court’s decision to prevent double jeopardy can absolve someone from wrongful prosecution. | A wrongful conviction in the absence of double jeopardy can lead to a failure to absolve the innocent. |
| Unjust | Double jeopardy ensures that individuals are not punished unjustly. | The absence of double jeopardy may lead to unjust punishments. |
| Rightful | Avoiding double jeopardy ensures that the rightful verdict is upheld. | Double jeopardy can prevent the rightful verdict from being enforced. |
| Acquit | To prevent double jeopardy, the defendant must be acquitted in the first trial. | A failure to prevent double jeopardy may lead to requiring a retrial after a not guilty verdict. |
| Uphold | The legal system aims to uphold justice by avoiding double jeopardy. | Allowing double jeopardy undermines the ability to uphold justice. |
| Deprive | Double jeopardy deprives individuals of protection against repeated trials. | Protecting individuals from repeated trials does not deprive them but rather provides security. |
| Injustice | Double jeopardy is considered an injustice in legal proceedings. | Eliminating double jeopardy helps to rectify any injustice in the legal system. |
| Indict | The decision to indict must consider the implications of double jeopardy. | Double jeopardy can challenge the validity of an indictment. |
| Retrial | The defendant managed to avoid double jeopardy as the verdict was final. | The possibility of a retrial is eliminated by preventing double jeopardy. |
| Culprit | The absence of double jeopardy helps in identifying the true culprit. | Double jeopardy can create confusion about who the real culprit is. |
| Vindicate | Double jeopardy hinders the process of vindicating innocent individuals. | Preventing double jeopardy is essential to vindicate those who are innocent. |
| Maintain | To maintain fairness, it’s crucial to avoid double jeopardy in legal proceedings. | Double jeopardy disrupts the ability to maintain fairness in the legal system. |
| Clarify | Avoiding double jeopardy can clarify the outcome of legal cases. | The presence of double jeopardy may hinder efforts to clarify the verdict. |
| Accuse | The prosecution decided not to accuse the defendant again to prevent double jeopardy. | Bringing up new accusations would potentially put the defendant at risk of double jeopardy. |
| Validate | The absence of double jeopardy helps validate the results of the trial. | The existence of double jeopardy can question and invalidate the trial outcome. |
| Entitle | Every individual is entitled to protection against double jeopardy. | Failing to protect individuals goes against their entitlement to fair trials without double jeopardy. |
| Preserve | The legal system aims to preserve the rights of individuals by avoiding double jeopardy. | Allowing double jeopardy may weaken efforts to preserve the rights of individuals. |
| Resolve | Double jeopardy can complicate the resolution of legal disputes. | Removing double jeopardy aids in resolving legal disputes efficiently. |
More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Double Jeopardy
| Antonym | Sentence with Double Jeopardy | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Single | Double Jeopardy occurs when a person is prosecuted for the same offense twice. | Being tried twice for the same crime would be considered Single Jeopardy in the legal system. |
| Clear | In a case of Double Jeopardy, the defendant cannot be retried once found not guilty. | If the defendant is acquitted, it clears the path for a Clear Trial with no risk of further prosecution. |
| Innocence | Double Jeopardy laws protect individuals from being tried multiple times for the same crime. | The defendant’s acquittal in court is a declaration of their Innocence and should not be doubted. |
| Safe | Being protected by Double Jeopardy laws prevents individuals from facing repeated prosecutions. | Once acquitted, the defendant can feel Safe knowing they cannot be retried for the same offense. |
| Different | Double Jeopardy rules ensure that a person cannot face trial for a crime more than once. | A new trial for the same crime would be considered Different Jeopardy, violating legal protections. |
| Unique | The principle of Double Jeopardy is to safeguard individuals from being tried repeatedly. | The defendant’s protection from being retried guarantees a Unique legal position. |
| Secure | Double Jeopardy statutes protect individuals from enduring multiple trials for the same offense. | Once acquitted, the accused can feel Secure in the knowledge that they cannot be tried again. |
| Final | The principle of Double Jeopardy ensures that a person cannot be retried once acquitted. | Once an individual is acquitted, it marks the Final resolution of their legal matter. |
| Guarded | Double Jeopardy laws shield individuals from facing trial multiple times for the same crime. | These legal protections are in place to keep defendants Guarded against repeated prosecutions. |
| Protected | The concept of Double Jeopardy prevents individuals from being subject to multiple prosecutions. | Legal safeguards ensure the accused is Protected from being put on trial again for the same crime. |
| Immune | Double Jeopardy laws grant individuals immunity from being tried twice for the same offense. | The defendant’s acquittal makes them Immune from further prosecution in that specific case. |
| Exempt | In cases of Double Jeopardy, individuals are exempt from facing trial again for the same crime. | Once a defendant is acquitted, they become Exempt from any future trials related to that offense. |
| Single | Double Jeopardy is a protection against being tried for the same offense multiple times. | Facing trial only once for a crime ensures that the defendant is under Single Jeopardy. |
| Fair | The principle of Double Jeopardy upholds fairness by preventing repeated trials for one offense. | The defendant’s right to a Fair trial includes protection against being tried more than once. |
| Free | Double Jeopardy laws ensure that a person cannot be retried for the same crime after being acquitted. | Once acquitted, the individual is considered Free from the legal jeopardy they previously faced. |
| Relieved | Being protected by Double Jeopardy laws relieves individuals from the threat of repeated prosecutions. | The defendant can feel Relieved knowing they cannot be retried for the same offense. |
| Different | Double Jeopardy provisions prevent individuals from facing repeated trials for a single crime. | If there were a retrial post-acquittal, it would be a case of Different Jeopardy and not allowed. |
| Separate | Double Jeopardy laws ensure individuals are protected from being tried multiple times for one crime. | Each trial is distinct, and individuals should be separated from any Separate Jeopardy situations. |
| Unchallenged | The doctrine of Double Jeopardy defends individuals from facing multiple prosecutions for one offense. | Once an individual is cleared, their status is Unchallenged as they cannot be prosecuted further. |
| Certain | Double Jeopardy safeguards individuals from the uncertainty of facing repeated trials for the same crime. | Once acquitted, the defendant can be Certain that they will not face another trial for that offense. |
| Unquestioned | The protection of Double Jeopardy ensures that individuals will not be questioned multiple times for the same crime. | After acquittal, the defendant’s status should be Unquestioned since they cannot be retried for the offense. |
| Free | Double Jeopardy regulations prevent individuals from being tried twice for the same crime. | Once acquitted, the individual is considered Free from the legal troubles they previously encountered. |
| Independent | Double Jeopardy laws safeguard individuals by ensuring independence from repeated prosecutions. | The accused’s legal status post-acquittal should be Independent of any further trials for that offense. |
| Absolute | The concept of Double Jeopardy signifies absolute protection against being tried more than once. | The defendant’s acquittal marks an Absolute shield from further prosecution for the same crime. |
| Safe | Double Jeopardy rights prevent individuals from facing the risk of multiple trials for one offense. | Acquittal guarantees that the accused is legally Safe from any future prosecutions for the same crime. |
| Single | Double Jeopardy laws prohibit individuals from being prosecuted twice for the same crime. | Being tried for an offense only once ensures the individual is under Single Jeopardy in the legal system. |
| Decisive | Double Jeopardy rules make a decisive decision by not allowing individuals to be tried twice for the same offense. | Once acquitted, the legal system’s decision should be Decisive — the defendant cannot be retried for the crime. |
| Conclusive | The concept of Double Jeopardy reaches a conclusive end by protecting individuals from multiple prosecutions. | The legal system’s ruling post-acquittal should be Conclusive with respect to further trials for that offense. |
| Defended | Double Jeopardy laws defend individuals from facing repeated trials stemming from a single crime. | The accused should feel Defended by these laws, knowing they are protected from multiple prosecutions. |
| Overlooked | Being covered by Double Jeopardy laws ensures that individuals will not be overlooked for a second trial. | Once acquitted, the case should be Overlooked for retrial as they are shielded from facing the same jeopardy again. |
| Unprecedented | The protection of Double Jeopardy safeguards individuals from an unprecedented number of repeated trials. | Once found not guilty, the accused’s situation becomes Unprecedented in terms of protection from retrial. |
| Unchallenged | The protection of Double Jeopardy ensures that individuals’ status is unchallenged after being acquitted. | Following a verdict of not guilty, the defendant’s position should be guided by the status of Unchallenged Jeopardy. |
| Exclusive | Double Jeopardy laws mark the exclusive protection of individuals from enduring multiple prosecutions. | Individuals guaranteed protection under these laws should feel their safeguard is Exclusive and unassailable. |
| Vindicated | Double Jeopardy provisions vindicate individuals by preventing them from facing repeated trials. | The defendant’s clearance leads to them being Vindicated, with no chance of being tried again for the same crime. |
| Unhindered | The protection of Double Jeopardy ensures that individuals will not be hindered by repeated prosecutions. | Once acquitted, there should be an Unhindered path for the accused without the threat of facing the same charges again. |
| Unrestricted | The principle of Double Jeopardy guarantees that individuals will not be restricted by multiple prosecutions. | Once the defendant is acquitted, their legal position should be Unrestricted by the possibility of being retried. |
| Untouched | Protections of Double Jeopardy ensure that individuals are untouched by the threat of multiple prosecutions. | The defendant’s legal state should remain Untouched once acquitted, with no chance of being tried again for the crime. |
| Unfettered | The concept of Double Jeopardy allows individuals to be unfettered by the fear of facing repeated trials. | Once cleared of the charges, the accused should feel Unfettered, knowing they cannot be prosecuted again for the same crime. |
Outro
Antonyms of double jeopardy, opposite of double jeopardy and double jeopardy ka opposite word are the same thing. In contrast to double jeopardy, the legal concept that prevents a person from being tried for the same offense twice, the opposite term implies the possibility of facing multiple trials for the same crime. This may occur when new evidence arises, a mistrial is declared, or a conviction is overturned on appeal. The opposite word of double jeopardy thus indicates the potential for continued legal proceedings until a final verdict is reached in a case.
While double jeopardy protects individuals from being unfairly prosecuted multiple times for the same offense, the opposite concept ensures that justice can prevail in cases where there are legitimate grounds for retrial. By allowing for the possibility of further legal actions in certain circumstances, the opposite term of double jeopardy upholds the principle of due process and the pursuit of truth and accountability within the legal system.
Overall, understanding the opposite term of double jeopardy sheds light on the nuances of the legal process and the complexities involved in ensuring justice. While double jeopardy serves as a crucial safeguard against unjust prosecutions, the opposite concept underscores the importance of considering all relevant factors in pursuit of a just outcome in criminal cases.