When discussing the antonyms of patent, we are referring to concepts that are not readily visible, protected, or officially authorized. Antonyms of patent are essentially the opposite of something that is clearly stated, legally secured, or openly available for public use.
Unlike patents, which grant exclusive rights to an invention or discovery, the antonyms of patent lack formal recognition or protection under the law. These opposite ideas can encompass various forms of intellectual property, ideas, or innovative concepts that have not been officially registered or made public.
Exploring the antonyms of patent involves delving into the realm of undisclosed, unguarded, or hidden information. It involves understanding the opposite end of the spectrum from something that is openly shared, protected, and acknowledged by authorities.
Example Sentences With Opposite of Patent
| Antonym | Sentence with Patent | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| secretive | The inventor applied for a patent to protect their new invention. | The inventor kept their new invention secretive. |
| disclose | The company invested in a patent to prevent others from copying their technology. | The company decided to disclose all details about their new technology. |
| exposed | The patent was essential to ensuring the idea remained protected. | Without a patent, the idea was left exposed to potential theft. |
| public | The company filed a patent to make their new product official. | The company decided to keep their new product public without any protection. |
| visible | The artist wanted to ensure their unique painting was patented. | The artist chose not to make their painting visible to the public. |
| conspicuous | The company decided to file a patent for their innovative design. | The company did not want the design to be conspicuous and decided against a patent. |
| revealed | The pharmaceutical company patented the new drug formula. | The company decided not to keep the new drug formula revealed and skipped the patent process. |
| apparent | A patent was granted for the groundbreaking technology. | Without a patent, the true value of the technology was not apparent. |
| uncovered | The newly designed car was patented to protect its features. | The features of the car were not uncovered and were not protected by a patent. |
| transparent | The startup company sought to obtain a patent to safeguard its unique idea. | The startup company preferred to keep the idea transparent instead of getting a patent. |
| undisclosed | The new software program was patented to keep it safe from competitors. | The features of the program remained undisclosed to those without a patent. |
| concealed | The invention was granted a patent to secure its intellectual property. | Without a patent, the intellectual property would be concealed. |
| hidden | The new technology was patented to protect it from being copied. | The company chose to leave the technology hidden without a patent. |
| confidential | The company filed for a patent to maintain the confidentiality of their product. | The product details were kept confidential even after deciding not to get a patent. |
| inconspicuous | The designer decided to get a patent for their unique creation. | The creation was made to look inconspicuous without a patent as a form of protection. |
| private | The innovative idea remained patented to keep it private. | The idea was converted into public domain and taken off the private realm by skipping the patent process. |
| undivulged | The new concept was patented to protect it from being shared. | The concept was not undivulged and was made public without a patent. |
| shrouded | The company secured a patent for their unique business method. | The same method was shrouded in mystery without a patent, leaving it unprotected. |
| camouflaged | The technology was patented to prevent competitors from copying it. | Without a patent, the technology could not remain camouflaged from potential thieves. |
| covert | The formula for the new potion was patented to keep it from being known. | Without a patent, the formula would no longer be covert and would be exposed. |
| guarded | The idea was patented to ensure it remained guarded against theft. | The idea was left unguarded without a patent, open for anyone to take. |
| unclear | The decision was made to obtain a patent for the groundbreaking technology. | The choice not to get a patent made the plan unclear about the technology’s protection. |
| enigmatic | The invention was patented to maintain its enigmatic nature. | Without a patent, the invention lost its enigma and became common knowledge. |
| veiled | The unique design was patented to keep its details veiled. | The details of the design were no longer kept veiled when the decision was made not to obtain a patent. |
| stealthy | The company opted to get a patent for their innovative device. | The company chose not to be stealthy and openly shared their device without a patent. |
| silenced | The process was patented to ensure it was not silenced by competitors. | Without a patent, the process could be silenced and copied freely. |
| suppressed | The technology was patented to prevent it from being suppressed. | Without a patent, the technology would be left suppressed and not protected. |
| repressed | The company decided to obtain a patent for its revolutionary idea. | The revolutionary idea would be repressed without a patent to safeguard its uniqueness. |
| quiet | The decision was made to file a patent for the new concept. | The new concept would remain quiet without a patent for protection against disclosure. |
| furtive | The company sought to obtain a patent to protect its furtive innovation. | The innovation would no longer be furtive but left open without a patent for protection. |
| enshrouded | The company decided to protect its project by obtaining a patent. | The project remained in the open and was no longer enshrouded after skipping the patent process. |
| opaque | The company secured a patent to keep its process opaque to competitors. | The choice to skip the patent process made the process no longer opaque and visible to everyone. |
| shielded | The new invention was patented to keep it shielded from others. | Without a patent, the invention would no longer be shielded and could be replicated freely. |
| unresolved | The decision to apply for a patent was made to resolve the issue. | The issue would be left unresolved without a patent for the idea’s protection. |
| clouded | The company decided to secure a patent for their cutting-edge technology. | The technology would no longer remain clouded if it were made public without a patent. |
| unlocked | The company chose to get a patent to ensure their new discovery remained locked and protected. | The new discovery remained unlocked after the decision was made not to get a patent. |
More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Patent
| Antonym | Sentence with Patent | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Hidden | The company filed a patent for their new invention. | The company kept their new invention hidden from the public. |
| Concealed | The details of the patent were not disclosed. | The details of the patent were intentionally concealed. |
| Secret | The patent application was kept confidential. | The information in the patent application was not meant to be secret. |
| Public | The patent was made public for everyone to see. | The patent was not meant to be public information. |
| Exposed | The patent revealed the unique features of the invention. | The inventor did not want the details of the invention to be exposed |
| Disguised | The patent was a clear representation of the new technology. | The true innovation was cleverly disguised in the patent. |
| Open | The patent was openly available for review. | The details of the invention were not meant to be kept so open. |
| Obvious | The patent made it obvious that the invention was unique. | The lack of patent made it obvious that the idea was not protected. |
| Unprotected | The patent provided legal protection for the invention. | Without a patent, the invention was unprotected. |
| Free | The patent allowed the company to have exclusive rights. | The lack of patent made the technology free for anyone to use. |
| Unpatented | The innovative idea was protected by a patent. | The new concept remained unpatented and vulnerable to theft. |
| Undisclosed | The patent application kept the details secure. | The details of the invention were purposely undisclosed. |
| Private | The company filed a patent to maintain privacy. | The new invention was not meant to remain private. |
| Clandestine | The secretive nature of the patent raised suspicions. | The lack of patent made the project seem less clandestine. |
| Unpublished | The patent was published for public examination. | The innovative design remained unpublished. |
| Revealed | The patent revealed the inner workings of the invention. | The inventor preferred to keep the technology revealed. |
| Uncovered | The protection provided by the patent was essential. | The lack of patent left the innovation uncovered. |
| Unlocked | The patent created barriers for competition. | The absence of a patent left the idea unlocked for others. |
| Unexposed | The patent exposed the unique features of the invention. | The inventor preferred to keep the innovation unexposed. |
| Closed | The patent was closed to further modifications. | Without a patent, the project remained open for adjustments. |
| Covert | The covert nature of the patent raised concerns. | The new idea was meant to be more overt and not covert. |
| Limited | The patent provided a limited-time exclusive right. | The innovation was not meant to be so limited in its use. |
| Inactive | The patent gave the company exclusive rights. | Without a patent, the technology was left inactive. |
| Unrevealed | The details in the patent were intriguing. | The inventor wanted to keep some elements of the project unrevealed. |
| Unsecured | The patent ensured the security of the invention. | The lack of patent left the idea vulnerable and unsecured. |
| Honest | The company was honest about the patent process. | Without a patent, the company’s honesty was put into question. |
| Disclosed | The patent application disclosed important information. | The subject of the invention was to remain undisclosed. |
| Blatant | The blatant nature of the patent filing concerned others. | The idea was supposed to be more discreet and not so blatant. |
| Revealing | The patent was revealing in terms of the innovation. | The company aimed to keep the project less revealing. |
| Unprotected | The patent provided protection against infringement. | The lack of patent left the concept unprotected. |
| Unsafe | Having a solid patent made the project safe. | The absence of patent made the project seem risky and unsafe. |
| Unveiled | The patent unveiled the unique concept. | The goal was to keep the idea hidden and not easily unveiled. |
| Bare | Having a patent gave the project a solid foundation. | Without a patent, the concept was left bare and unprotected. |
| Unreserved | The patent allowed the company to have exclusive rights. | The company did not want to seem reserved and preferred an unreserved approach. |
| Overt | The overt nature of the patent application raised eyebrows. | The inventor believed the idea was worth announcing, not keeping overt. |
| Publicized | The company publicized the launch of a patented product. | The lack of patent meant the launch was not meant to be publicized. |
| Common | The patent provided legal protection for the unique design. | The solution was supposed to be easily accessible and more common. |
Outro
Antonyms of patent, opposite of patent and patent ka opposite word are the same thing. In conclusion, while patents protect the exclusive rights of inventors to their creations, the opposite word of patent signifies the absence of such protection. This lack of patent can result in ideas, products, or processes being freely accessible for anyone to use, replicate, or modify without legal restrictions or ownership claims. It may lead to a more open and collaborative environment where innovation can thrive through shared knowledge and resources.
Without a patent, individuals or companies may not have the incentive or assurance of financial rewards to invest in research and development, potentially impeding progress and advancement in various industries. On the other hand, the absence of patent barriers can also foster creativity, competition, and the rapid spread of innovations, ultimately benefiting society as a whole. Striking a balance between protecting intellectual property and promoting innovation without patents remains a complex challenge that requires ongoing consideration and adaptation within the dynamic landscape of technology and creativity.