What Is The Opposite of Democratic? – Example Sentences

Antonyms of democratic refer to concepts or systems that are not characterized by equality, representation, or participation of all individuals in decision-making processes. These opposing ideas often involve a lack of transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in governance or organizational structures.

Non-democratic counterparts typically involve centralized power, limited freedoms, and restricted rights for individuals. This can manifest in forms such as authoritarianism, dictatorship, or totalitarianism, where power is concentrated in the hands of a select few rather than being distributed among the populace.

Understanding the antonyms of democratic helps to recognize the various ways in which systems can deviate from principles of equality, freedom, and fairness. By examining these contrasting concepts, we gain insight into the importance of upholding democratic values and safeguarding against the erosion of fundamental rights and liberties.

Example Sentences With Opposite of Democratic

Antonym	Sentence with Democratic	Sentence with Antonym
Authoritarian	In a democratic society, people have the power to elect their leaders.	In an authoritarian regime, the leaders have all the power and control.
Autocratic	A democratic government encourages citizen participation in decision-making.	An autocratic ruler makes all decisions without consulting the citizens.
Totalitarian	Democratic systems allow for freedoms of speech and expression.	Totalitarian regimes heavily restrict freedom of speech and expression.
Oligarchic	The power in a democratic society is distributed among the people.	In an oligarchic system, power is concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy individuals.
Dictatorial	Democratic principles emphasize equality and representation for all citizens.	Dictatorial leaders rule with absolute authority and suppress opposition.
Monarchic	Many countries have adopted democratic forms of government.	Monarchic systems are based on hereditary rule by a king or queen.
Tyrannical	Democratic societies place importance on individual rights and liberties.	Tyrannical rulers oppress their people and violate their rights.
Despotic	A democratic government is accountable to the people it serves.	Despotic regimes are marked by the absolute power of a single leader.
Oppressive	Democratic countries strive to create a fair and just society for all.	Oppressive governments suppress dissent and limit freedom for citizens.
Censorious	Democratic societies promote freedom of the press and information.	Censorious regimes control the media and censor critical voices.
Domineering	In a democratic system, leaders are expected to listen to the public’s concerns.	Domineering rulers impose their will on the populace without question.
Autarchic	Democratic governments are characterized by their openness and inclusivity.	Autarchic leaders exercise absolute power and make decisions independently.
Imperial	Democratic values prioritize the collective well-being of society.	Imperial governments expand their territories through conquest and domination.
Feudal	Democratic societies ensure that power is not concentrated in a select few.	Feudal systems are hierarchical, with power held by lords over serfs.
Intolerant	Democratic principles promote tolerance and acceptance of diverse beliefs.	Intolerant regimes persecute those who do not conform to the ruling ideology.
Prescriptive	Democratic processes involve input from a wide range of stakeholders.	Prescriptive governments dictate policies without considering public opinion.
Inegalitarian	Democratic systems work to reduce inequalities and provide equal opportunities.	Inegalitarian societies maintain social divisions and favor certain groups over others.
Dogmatic	Democratic societies value critical thinking and open debate on different issues.	Dogmatic societies enforce rigid beliefs and discourage questioning.
Arbitrary	Democratic decision-making processes prioritize fairness and transparency.	Arbitrary rulers make decisions based on personal whims without justification.
Hierarchical	Democratic structures emphasize equality and representation of all citizens.	Hierarchical societies enforce rigid social classes and power structures.
Paternalistic	Democratic governments respect the autonomy of individuals and their choices.	Paternalistic leaders make decisions for others without their consent.
Bureaucratic	Democratic systems strive for efficiency and accountability in governance.	Bureaucratic regimes are characterized by red tape and administrative inefficiencies.
Kleptocratic	Democratic societies prioritize the rule of law and integrity in governance.	Kleptocratic leaders engage in corruption and embezzlement of public funds.
Totalistic	Democratic values emphasize individual freedoms and civil liberties.	Totalistic regimes control all aspects of society, leaving no room for dissent.
Antonymous	Democratic societies encourage discourse and dialogue for decision-making.	Antonymous governments suppress dissent and ignore public input.
Closed	Democratic systems are designed to be open and accessible to the public.	Closed societies limit access to information and decision-making processes.
Impervious	Democratic governments must be responsive and receptive to citizens’ needs.	Impervious regimes are unyielding and do not consider public feedback.
Unyielding	Democratic leaders must be willing to compromise and negotiate for the common good.	Unyielding rulers refuse to make concessions and impose their will on others.
Unbending	Democratic societies adapt to changing circumstances and challenges through dialogue.	Unbending governments are inflexible and reluctant to consider alternative viewpoints.
Opposed	Democratic societies value diverse perspectives and encourage constructive debate.	Opposed regimes suppress dissent and punish those who challenge the status quo.
Repressive	Democratic systems protect individual rights and guard against repression.	Repressive governments use force to stifle opposition and restrict freedoms.
Regressive	Democratic societies progress through inclusive policies and respect for human rights.	Regressive regimes regress in social development and suppress progressive values.
Unprogressive	Democratic systems promote social progress and strive for a better future for all.	Unprogressive governments hinder social development and resist change.
Serfdom	Democratic societies grant citizens political rights and freedoms to govern themselves.	Serfdom systems subject individuals to servitude and lack of autonomy.
Slavish	Democratic societies empower individuals to participate in decision-making processes.	Slavish regimes subjugate individuals to absolute authority without freedom.
Restricted	Democratic societies uphold principles of freedom and allow diverse opinions.	Restricted governments limit individual freedoms and suppress dissenting views.
Limited	Democratic processes thrive on inclusivity and participation from all citizens.	Limited systems deny full participation and restrict certain groups.
Standardized	Democratic societies promote diversity and respect for individual differences.	Standardized regimes enforce uniformity and suppress individuality.

More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Democratic

Antonym	Sentence with Democratic	Sentence with Antonym
Authoritarian	The country implemented democratic reforms.	The leader imposed authoritarian rule.
Dictatorial	A democratic system values equality.	The dictator enforced dictatorial policies.
Oppressive	People have the right to vote in a democratic society.	Citizens have no freedoms in an oppressive regime.
Totalitarian	The government is based on democratic principles.	The nation is under a totalitarian regime.
Autocratic	In a democratic society, people have a voice.	The ruler’s decisions were autocratic.
Tyrannical	The democratic process ensures representation.	Under the tyrannical leadership, no dissent is allowed.
Oligarchic	The system was designed to be democratic.	The government was more oligarchic in nature.
Authoritative	The leaders respected the democratic values.	The administration became more authoritative.
Monarchical	People participate in democratic elections.	The nation was under a monarchical rule.
Oppressor	The democratic process allows for diverse opinions.	The ruler was known to be an oppressor.
Imperial	The citizens appreciate democratic principles.	The monarch implemented imperial decisions.
Censorious	The country celebrates democratic ideals.	The government was highly censorious.
Overbearing	The society is built on democratic values.	The authority was extremely overbearing.
Tsarist	Democratic nations respect human rights.	The old regime was more Tsarist in nature.
Censorial	The nation was founded on democratic beliefs.	The party in power became censorial.
Despotic	Changes were made through the democratic process.	The ruler’s style was despotic.
Monopolistic	Democratic reforms were implemented.	The economy was monopolistic.
Autarchic	The government was meant to be democratic.	The state ended up being autarchic.
Domineering	The system emphasized democratic principles.	The leader was known for being domineering.
Feudal	The society transitioned to a democratic system.	The era was marked by feudal practices.
Rigid	The party is based on democratic principles.	The organization is known for its rigid structure.
Draconian	People appreciated the democratic laws.	The new regulations seemed draconian.
Impervious	The nation adheres to democratic norms.	The government was impervious to criticism.
Stifling	The population enjoys democratic freedoms.	The regime was known for its stifling control.
Closed	Democratic societies believe in civil liberties.	The country was closed off from the world.
Repressive	The nation follows democratic ideologies.	The government’s actions were repressive.
Imperialistic	The government works based on democratic governance.	The empire practiced imperialistic policies.
Unyielding	Democratic values promote equality.	The administration’s stance was unyielding.
Liberty-less	The country values democratic principles.	The citizens lived in a liberty-less regime.
Imperious	The government was founded on democratic ideals.	The leader’s attitude was imperious.
Subjugating	The nation moves towards a democratic future.	The ruler was known for subjugating the population.
Feudalistic	Democratic changes were slowly implemented.	The society held onto its feudalistic structures.
Autonomous	People are free to express in democratic systems.	The region was not autonomous.
Pernicious	The society embraced democratic values.	The rule of law became pernicious.
Czarist	Democratic principles are enshrined in the constitution.	The government was seen as Czarist.
Diktat-based	The reforms aimed to make the system more democratic.	The policies were diktat-based.
Domination	The society aimed to be inclusive and democratic.	The ruling party sought domination.
Serfdom	The populace participates in the democratic process.	The society was marked by serfdom.

Outro
Antonyms of democratic, opposite of democratic and democratic ka opposite word are the same thing. In conclusion, the opposite word of democratic pertains to a system or ideology that does not prioritize equal participation, representation, or decision-making among its members. This contrasting concept often involves centralized power and authority, with limited or no involvement of the general populace in the governing process.

Without embracing democratic values such as equality, inclusivity, and transparency, societies may risk facing disparities, marginalization, and lack of accountability within their governing structures. It is crucial for individuals and communities to advocate for democratic principles to ensure that their voices are heard, their rights are protected, and their interests are fairly represented in shaping the direction of their societies.

By recognizing the importance of democratic practices and striving to uphold them in various aspects of governance and decision-making, societies can promote social cohesion, justice, and progress. Upholding democratic values ultimately fosters a more inclusive, responsible, and harmonious environment for all individuals to thrive and actively participate in shaping their collective future.