When discussing the antonyms of automated, we are exploring the opposite of processes or systems that are self-operating or self-regulating. In contrast to automation, which involves the use of technology to control and monitor tasks without human intervention, the antonyms of automated refer to manual methods that require human involvement and control to function.
Manual processes are the direct opposite of automated systems, relying on human effort and decision-making to accomplish various tasks or operations. Unlike automation, where tasks are performed automatically following pre-set instructions, manual processes require hands-on participation and oversight from individuals to ensure successful completion.
By examining the antonyms of automated, we gain insight into the importance of human involvement in tasks that cannot be easily or effectively carried out through automated means. These manual processes highlight the inherent value of human judgment, adaptability, and skill in various operations that rely on personal interaction and decision-making.
Example Sentences With Opposite of Automated
Antonym | Sentence with Automated | Sentence with Antonym |
---|---|---|
Manual | The process was automated for efficiency. | The task had to be done manually by hand. |
Hand-operated | The factory had many automated machines. | They relied on hand-operated equipment. |
Non-automatic | The automated system saved a lot of time. | The new system is non-automatic. |
Traditional | The company implemented an automated solution. | They preferred to stick with traditional methods. |
Laborious | The software made the workflow automated. | The old way was slow and laborious. |
Non-mechanized | An automated process was introduced. | They avoided any non-mechanized solutions. |
Handcrafted | The machine could perform many automated tasks. | They prided themselves on their handcrafted products. |
Unmechanized | The factory aimed to be more automated. | They refused to adopt any unmechanized systems. |
Non-automatic | The system was set to be automated by next week. | The current process was entirely non-automatic. |
By hand | The new system was fully automated. | They planned to complete the task by hand. |
Manually-operated | The system was now automated for better results. | They used to run everything manually-operated. |
Manual | The process became more automated over time. | They preferred to keep things manual. |
Conventional | The factory opted for an automated assembly line. | They stuck with conventional manufacturing processes. |
Self-operated | The program was set to be fully automated. | They had to rely on things that were self-operated. |
By hand | The company invested heavily in automated solutions. | They insisted on doing everything by hand. |
People-powered | The factory moved towards automated technologies. | They believed in the value of people-powered systems. |
Labor-intensive | The new machinery was all automated. | They avoided anything that was too labor-intensive. |
Traditional | The process was made more automated. | They went back to their traditional ways. |
Manual | The company transitioned to a more automated system. | They reverted to the old manual processes. |
Hand-driven | The factory was upgrading to an automated facility. | They had always been in favor of hand-driven operations. |
Unmechanized | The company embraced automated technology. | They refused to consider any unmechanized options. |
Non-synthetic | The system now could handle automated tasks. | They didn’t want anything that was non-synthetic. |
Hand-driven | The company made the shift to automated systems. | They were used to everything being hand-driven. |
Manual | The process was streamlined through automation. | They reverted to old-fashioned manual methods. |
Non-automatic | The new system was entirely automated. | They were adamant about keeping it non-automatic. |
Hand-operated | Automated machinery took over most tasks. | They were not ready to let go of their hand-operated equipment. |
Conventional | The company embraced automated processes. | They were known for sticking to conventional techniques. |
Traditional | The system was upgraded to be more automated. | They had reservations about moving away from their traditional ways. |
Manual | The tasks were now simplified through automation. | They made the decision to return to doing things manually. |
Non-mechanized | The company invested in automated solutions. | They found it difficult to consider an approach that was non-mechanized. |
Labor-intensive | The entire process was made more automated. | They didn’t want to make any part of it labor-intensive. |
Hand-driven | The system was updated to be fully automated. | They were used to everything being hand-driven. |
By hand | The new system was introduced to be automated. | They were still in favor of doing things by hand. |
Self-managed | The factory aimed to become more automated. | But they were afraid of losing the self-managed aspect. |
Non-automatic | The company transitioned to a more automated setup. | They were cautious about anything being non-automatic. |
Manual | A decision was made to go fully automated. | They regretted not sticking with the manual process. |
Hand-operated | The process was upgraded to be more automated. | They longed for the familiar hand-operated way of doing things. |
Unmechanized | The factory aimed to introduce automated processes. | They weren’t ready to completely abandon their unmechanized approach. |
More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Automated
Antonym | Sentence with Automated | Sentence with Antonym |
---|---|---|
Manual | The automated system generated reports instantly. | The manual process required human input. |
Hand-operated | The factory uses automated machinery for production. | The device needs to be hand-operated. |
Non-automatic | The system will now run on an automated schedule. | The process used to be non-automatic. |
Labor-intensive | Automated machines have increased efficiency. | The old method was labor-intensive. |
Traditional | The new system is fully automated for tracking. | The previous method was traditional. |
Non-mechanized | The company implemented an automated system. | The production used to be non-mechanized. |
Craft | The automated assembly line increased production. | Each piece used to be made with craft. |
Old-fashioned | The automated process streamlined operations. | The outdated method was old-fashioned. |
Handcrafted | The factory invested in automated technology. | The products were previously handcrafted. |
Human | The system was automated to save time. | The manual process relied on human labor. |
Conventional | An automated response was sent to all inquiries. | The company reverted back to conventional methods. |
Analog | The automated system performed tasks efficiently. | The data used to be stored in analog format. |
Archaic | The new system is fully automated for data entry. | Previously, the data entry was archaic. |
Primitive | The automated process improved accuracy. | The original method was considered primitive. |
Low-tech | The company introduced automated inventory tracking. | The older tracking system was low-tech. |
Natural | The automated irrigation system waters the plants. | Before, the plants relied on natural rainfall. |
Vintage | The modern facility is equipped with automated tools. | The older facility used vintage machinery. |
Retrograde | The new software includes automated features. | The previous system had retrograde functions. |
Old-school | The new equipment is automated for efficiency. | The old setup was quite old-school. |
Primitive | The automated process increased productivity. | The original method was considered primitive. |
Non-automated | The company upgraded to an automated system. | The operations had previously been non-automated. |
Hands-on | The automated software manages payroll effectively. | Payroll was handled manually and was more hands-on. |
Customary | The new system is automated for order processing. | The customary method required manual entry. |
Prehistoric | The factory’s automated tools have been reliable. | The tools used previously were quite prehistoric. |
Mechanical | The automated system facilitated communication. | Before, communication was more mechanical. |
Artisanal | The company switched to automated production. | Their products had an artisanal touch before. |
Non-automatic | The automated process made data storage efficient. | The previous method was considered non-automatic. |
Traditional | The new automated system speeds up transactions. | The traditional method was much slower. |
Antique | The new machinery in the factory is automated. | The equipment they had before was antique. |
Made by hand | The factory now has automated painting technology. | The art pieces were previously made by hand. |
Analogous | The automated process simplified inventory control. | The system prior to this one was more analogous. |
Analog | The automated system completed the tasks quickly. | Previously, tasks were done in a more analog manner. |
Basic | The company installed automated security systems. | The security measures were previously quite basic. |
Laborious | The automated machines cut down production time. | The production process was tedious and laborious. |
Less automated | The new warehouse is fully automated for tracking. | The tracking in the old warehouse was less automated. |
Retro | The new system is automated for inventory control. | The previous setup had a much more retro feel. |
Traditional | The automated system was set up for record-keeping. | The traditional method was manual record-keeping. |
Hands-off | The company transitioned to automated data management. | Before, data management was more hands-off. |
Outro
Antonyms of automated, opposite of automated and automated ka opposite word are the same thing. In comparison to automated processes, the opposite word often involves manual intervention. While automated systems prioritize efficiency and speed, manual methods rely on human involvement and decision-making. This human touch allows for more flexibility and customization in handling tasks and addressing unique situations.
Despite the drawbacks of increased time and potential for errors in manual processes, they offer a level of adaptability and precision that can be beneficial in certain scenarios. The opposite of automation may require more effort and resources, but the ability to tailor solutions to specific needs can result in more satisfactory outcomes.
Ultimately, striking a balance between automated and manual approaches is key to optimizing productivity and effectiveness. Leveraging the strengths of both methods can lead to a well-rounded strategy that maximizes efficiency while also allowing for the necessary human touch to address complex challenges.