The antonyms of coalition are divisions or disunity. These terms refer to the state of being separate or divided, rather than united in a common purpose or goal. Divisions denote the lack of collaboration or agreement among individuals or groups, while disunity emphasizes the absence of harmony or togetherness.
In contrast to a coalition, divisions can arise when there is disagreement or conflict among parties, leading to fragmentation or separation. Disunity similarly implies a lack of cohesion or solidarity, resulting in discord or lack of coordination. Both divisions and disunity highlight the absence of unity or cooperation that is typically seen in a coalition.
Understanding the antonyms of coalition is essential for recognizing the dynamics of discord or fragmentation within a group or society. By exploring divisions and disunity, we gain insight into the challenges that can hinder collaboration and hinder progress towards common goals. Recognizing these contrasts can also highlight the importance of overcoming differences to foster unity and harmony.
Example Sentences With Opposite of Coalition
Antonym | Sentence with Coalition | Sentence with Antonym |
---|---|---|
Division | Different parties came together in coalition to win the election. | The ongoing conflicts and division among the group led to their failure. |
Separation | The coalition of nations worked together for peaceful relations. | The separation of allies weakened their collective strength. |
Disunity | The coalition of activists achieved their goal through unity. | The lack of communication created disunity among team members. |
Rivalry | The coalition of companies resulted in increased market share. | Fierce rivalry between the two companies prevented any cooperation. |
Dissociation | The political parties formed a coalition to gain more votes. | The dissociation of parties led to individual pursuits over common goals. |
Isolation | In order to achieve their agenda, they formed a strong coalition. | The group’s decision to maintain isolation hindered their progress. |
Disagreement | Despite their differences, political parties formed a successful coalition. | Constant disagreement among members resulted in the collapse of the organization. |
Disconnection | The coalition of countries was established to address climate change. | The lack of communication and disconnection between leaders delayed progress. |
Discord | A coalition of community leaders worked on improving public services. | The discord within the group resulted in chaos and lack of progress. |
Parting | The coalition of countries was instrumental in promoting peace. | The parting of ways among allies weakened their power. |
Antagonism | The formation of a coalition was essential for the charity event. | The deep-rooted antagonism among members hindered collaboration. |
Segregation | A coalition of groups worked together to advocate for human rights. | Segregation of communities prevented mutual cooperation. |
Fragmentation | The coalition was successful in implementing social welfare programs. | The group’s fragmentation led to a lack of direction and progress. |
Breakup | The coalition of nations was crucial in maintaining regional peace. | The unexpected breakup of allies strained diplomatic relations. |
Alienation | The coalition among environmental activists led to concrete actions. | Alienation among team members hindered collaboration efforts. |
Confrontation | The coalition between political parties aimed to improve healthcare. | Confrontation between leaders disrupted potential alliances. |
Divergence | A coalition of students worked together on a climate change project. | Due to ideological divergence, the group disbanded with no progress. |
Disaffiliation | The coalition formed by tech companies resulted in technological advancements. | The group’s disaffiliation due to disagreements slowed down innovation. |
Uniting | The coalition of organizations brought positive change to the community. | Uniting forces against a common enemy was the only way to survive. |
Fragmenting | The coalition of nations showed strength in times of crisis. | The parties’ fragmenting of relationships affected their cause negatively. |
Detachment | The success of their project was due to the strong coalition formed. | Detachment from the cause led to the dissolution of the group. |
Withdrawal | The coalition of volunteers made a significant impact on the local community. | Withdrawal of support from members weakened the organization. |
Seclusion | The coalition formed by artists promoted collaboration and creativity. | The artist’s preference for seclusion hindered potential partnerships. |
Disassociation | The coalition between businesses led to economic growth in the region. | Lack of trust and frequent disassociation among team members affected their work. |
Union | The coalition of countries pledged to work together for global peace. | The absence of a strong union among nations weakened their influence. |
Discordance | The coalition was successful in achieving their environmental goals. | The constant discordance within the group clouded their success. |
Disagreement | The goal of the coalition was to address social inequality. | Internal disagreement caused conflicts within the group. |
Separatism | The coalition of political parties aimed for effective governance. | The rise of separatism within the parties undermined their unity. |
Disjunction | The coalition of activists stood together to demand political change. | Disjunction among members weakened their advocacy efforts. |
Estrangement | The coalition between the organizations brought about positive change. | Estrangement among members weakened the unity and effectiveness of the group. |
Antagonistic | The coalition aimed to bring positive change to the local community. | The antagonistic relationship between members caused the group to fail. |
Segregation | The coalition between countries was pivotal in disaster relief efforts. | Historical segregation among the nations delayed response and recovery efforts. |
Connection | The success of the project was due to the strong coalition formed. | Lack of connection and communication between team members affected progress. |
Integration | The coalition of organizations worked together to provide aid to refugees. | Lack of integration and cooperation resulted in the failure of the project. |
Schism | The coalition formed by politicians aimed to address key social issues. | The schism within members over ideological differences led to disintegration. |
Harmony | The coalition among political parties aimed to bring stability to the country. | The lack of harmony led to conflicts and disarray within the group. |
Affiliation | The coalition of NGOs worked together to combat deforestation. | Lack of affiliation among members hindered progress on the environmental issue. |
Union | The coalition of countries together tackled the humanitarian crisis. | The absence of a strong union among nations affected their ability to respond. |
More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Coalition
Antonym | Sentence with Coalition | Sentence with Antonym |
---|---|---|
Division | The coalition of parties agreed on a common agenda. | The division among the parties prevented them from reaching a consensus. |
Disunion | The group formed a strong coalition to tackle the issue. | The disunion within the group weakened their ability to address the matter. |
Separation | Coalition governments are common in many countries. | Separation of powers ensures checks and balances in a democratic system. |
Discord | The coalition between the two companies resulted in a successful merger. | The discord between the companies led to the collapse of the deal. |
Alienation | There was a coalition of teachers, parents, and students working for education reform. | The feeling of alienation among the stakeholders hindered progress in the education sector. |
Opposition | The political parties formed a coalition to address the pressing issue. | The opposition parties criticized the decision made by the ruling coalition. |
Rivalry | The coalition of nations helped in maintaining peace in the region. | The rivalry among the nations escalated tensions and led to conflicts. |
Separateness | The countries formed a coalition to combat climate change collectively. | The sense of separateness among the nations hindered global efforts to address the issue. |
Divorce | The parties entered into a coalition to work on the project together. | The divorce of opinions among the stakeholders caused delays in project completion. |
Disconnection | The coalition of environmental groups advocated for sustainable practices. | The disconnection between policymakers and activists hindered progress in environmental conservation. |
Fragmentation | The coalition of organizations helped in disaster relief efforts. | The fragmentation of resources across multiple groups affected the efficiency of the relief operations. |
Segregation | The unions formed a coalition to negotiate better working conditions. | Segregation of labor groups weakened their bargaining power. |
Isolation | The community members formed a coalition to address social issues collectively. | The isolation of certain groups within the community hindered the effectiveness of the coalition. |
Opposition | The political parties formed a coalition government to tackle economic challenges. | The opposition from various stakeholders undermined the coalition’s policy decisions. |
Hostility | The coalition of countries worked together to combat terrorism. | The hostility between the nations hindered diplomatic efforts. |
Fracture | The parties formed a coalition to address healthcare reforms. | The fracture within the coalition led to the collapse of the reform efforts. |
Discordance | The artists formed a coalition to promote cultural diversity. | The discordance among the members affected the coalition’s outreach. |
Contradiction | The coalition of businesses supported the new trade policies. | There was a contradiction between the coalition’s stance and the interests of individual businesses. |
Alienation | The coalition of interest groups lobbied for policy changes. | The sense of alienation among certain members affected the coalition’s effectiveness. |
Resistance | The community leaders formed a coalition to address social inequalities. | The resistance from traditionalists slowed down the coalition’s progress. |
Disagreement | The parties formed a coalition to govern the country effectively. | Disagreement over key policy issues caused rifts within the coalition. |
Hostility | The coalition of NGOs worked to provide aid to disaster-stricken areas. | The hostility between rival factions impacted the delivery of aid. |
Division | The countries came together in a coalition to combat climate change. | The ideological division among nations hindered global cooperation. |
Disunity | The organizations formed a coalition to promote sustainable practices. | The lack of unity and disunity among the members affected the coalition’s impact. |
Estrangement | The members of the community formed a coalition to address safety concerns. | The estrangement of certain groups hindered collaboration within the coalition. |
Disconnection | The coalition of researchers collaborated on a groundbreaking study. | The disconnection between theory and practice hindered the application of the study’s findings. |
Disintegration | The parties formed a coalition to address legislative reforms. | The disintegration of the coalition resulted from internal conflicts. |
Opposition | The groups formed a coalition to advocate for human rights. | The opposition from vested interests hindered the coalition’s progress. |
Resistance | The coalition of activists worked to promote environmental conservation. | The resistance from policymakers slowed down the coalition’s advocacy efforts. |
Hostility | The nations formed a coalition to address security threats in the region. | The deep-rooted hostility among the nations hindered diplomatic negotiations. |
Separation | The parties agreed to form a coalition government for stability. | The separation of powers ensures checks and balances in the political system. |
Disagreement | The stakeholders formed a coalition to address community issues. | Disagreement over priorities affected the coalition’s decision-making process. |
Rivalry | The companies formed a coalition to promote industry standards. | The intense rivalry between the companies affected the sustainability of the coalition. |
Segregation | The participants formed a coalition to advocate for inclusion. | Segregation of resources among the members weakened the coalition’s impact. |
Isolation | The groups formed a coalition to address youth unemployment. | The feeling of isolation among certain members affected the coalition’s cohesion. |
Division | The coalition of nations worked together to combat infectious diseases. | The deep division among nations hindered the coordination of healthcare efforts. |
Disunity | The stakeholders formed a coalition to tackle corruption in the industry. | The lack of unity and disunity among the stakeholders affected the coalition’s effectiveness. |
Outro
Antonyms of coalition, opposite of coalition and coalition ka opposite word are the same thing. In a world often divided by conflict and polarization, it is crucial to acknowledge the importance of unity and solidarity. While coalitions may bring together different groups for a common cause, it is equally vital to recognize the strength that can be found in independence and individualism. By standing alone, individuals can uphold their values and beliefs without compromise, fostering a sense of autonomy and self-reliance.
Moreover, the opposite of coalition can offer a unique opportunity for introspection and personal growth. When individuals operate independently, they have the chance to explore their own strengths and weaknesses, develop their skills, and cultivate a sense of self-assurance. This can lead to a deeper understanding of one’s true capabilities and potential, empowering individuals to pursue their goals with confidence and determination.
Ultimately, while coalitions serve a valuable purpose in bringing people together, embracing the opposite of coalition can allow individuals to tap into their inner strength and showcase their individuality. By valuing independence and self-reliance, individuals can chart their own paths and make meaningful contributions to society, proving that unity and solidarity can also be found in the strength of a single individual.