What Is The Opposite of Consensus? – Example Sentences

When discussing antonyms of consensus, we are exploring situations where there is a lack of agreement among a group of individuals. The term “consensus” refers to a general agreement or harmony of opinion. In contrast, antonyms of consensus encompass differing viewpoints and discord within a group.

Divergence represents one antonym of consensus, indicating a division or separation of opinions among individuals. In this context, disagreement arises, leading to a lack of consensus on a particular matter. This opposition in viewpoints can result in conflicting perspectives and hinder the ability to reach a mutual understanding.

Another antonym of consensus is dissension, depicting a disagreement or dispute within a group that prevents unity of opinion. Dissension signifies a divergent viewpoint that opposes the prevailing consensus, resulting in a lack of harmony or agreement among the members involved. This discord can create challenges in decision-making processes and impede progress towards a shared goal.

Example Sentences With Opposite of Consensus

Antonym Sentence with Consensus Sentence with Antonym
Disagreement After much discussion, we finally reached a consensus. The team members were in disagreement about the best approach.
Discord The board came to a consensus on the budget. There was discord among the shareholders regarding the company’s direction.
Conflict Despite the opposing views, a consensus was reached. The conflict between the two parties continued with no resolution in sight.
Dispute The committee unanimously agreed, achieving consensus. The ongoing dispute over the land rights hindered progress.
Dissension The assembly finally found consensus on the issue. Dissension in the group made it difficult to make any decisions.
Opposition We were able to find a consensus amidst differing opinions. The opposition by certain members prevented any agreement from being reached.
Contention The team worked collaboratively to establish consensus. The constant contention among the members made it hard to move forward.
Clash There was a clear consensus among the stakeholders. The clash of opinions led to a deadlock in the negotiations.
Divergence The group showed unity in achieving consensus. The divergence of viewpoints prevented any decision from being made.
Disunity The meeting ended with a satisfactory consensus. Disunity among the team made it impossible to agree on a course of action.
Dissent The committee warmly embraced the idea of consensus. Dissent from a few members halted progress on the project.
Disagreement Our team strives to reach consensus on key issues. Ongoing disagreement within the group hindered productivity.
Contest The residents came to a consensus on the community project. Contest between the two sides led to a standstill in negotiations.
Differ Despite the challenges, a consensus was eventually achieved. The team continued to differ on the best course of action.
Strife The members of the committee found consensus quickly. The strife between the partners prolonged the decision-making process.
Incompatibility The council reached consensus after much deliberation. Incompatibility among the stakeholders derailed the project.
Rivalry The council members came to a unanimous consensus. Intense rivalry among the groups made it impossible to agree.
Disunion The team found consensus through open communication. The disunion in the organization led to confusion and uncertainty.
Divarication The team showed solidarity by achieving consensus. The divarication in opinions prevented any decision from being made.
Argument Despite differing opinions, the committee reached a consensus. The constant argument prevented any agreement from being reached.
Dissension The team finally reached consensus on the matter. Dissension among the members stalled progress on the project.
Tension The group members reached consensus on the issue. Tension among the team led to a breakdown in communication.
Discrepancy Despite initial differences, a consensus was reached. The discrepancy in viewpoints caused a deadlock in negotiations.
Division The team managed to find consensus through collaboration. Ongoing division among the stakeholders made it hard to agree on anything.
Battle The stakeholders found a common consensus on the proposal. The ongoing battle between the parties led to a stalemate.
Discordance Despite initial disagreements, consensus was achieved. The discordance within the group hindered any progress.
Opposition The committee was able to find consensus on the issue at hand. The constant opposition from certain members halted progress.
Hostility The team worked together to establish consensus. The hostility in the group hindered any attempts at cooperation.
Disunity The council members reached a satisfactory consensus. Disunity among the stakeholders caused confusion and disagreement.
Disagreement Despite diverse opinions, the group managed to find consensus. Ongoing disagreement within the team prevented any resolution.
Schism The members were able to find consensus after much debate. The deep schism within the board hindered any decision-making.
Turmoil The team reached consensus on the new project plan. The ongoing turmoil within the organization made it hard to agree on anything.
Struggle The council eventually reached a point of consensus. The constant struggle among the stakeholders led to a standstill.
Disjunction Despite the challenges, the board achieved consensus. The disjunction in opinions made it impossible to move forward.
Clamor The committee settled the matter with a clear consensus. The constant clamor within the group hindered any progress.
Disharmony The team finally reached a consensus on the decision. The ongoing disharmony within the team prevented any agreement.
See also  What Is The Opposite of Provincial? - Example Sentences

More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Consensus

Antonym Sentence with Consensus Sentence with Antonym
Dissension After much discussion, they reached a consensus on the issue. There was dissension among the team, leading to no agreement.
Disagreement The panel of experts found consensus on the best course of action. There was a notable disagreement among the group members.
Conflict The team members had a consensus on the new project proposal. The conflict in opinions prevented a unified decision.
Discord Despite differences, the committee managed to achieve consensus. Discord within the group hindered progress.
Clashing The board members finally reached a consensus on the budget allocation. Their clashing opinions made it impossible to agree.
Opposition There was consensus among the shareholders regarding the merger. The proposal faced strong opposition from the stakeholders.
Disunity The team worked together to find a consensus on the project timeline. Disunity within the group created roadblocks.
Disaccord The committee resolved their differences and established a consensus. Lingering disaccord prevented any agreement.
Nonconformity The members of the organization achieved a consensus on the new policies. Nonconformity and resistance were evident in the discussions.
Dissonance Despite initial disagreements, the members found consensus on the issue. The meeting was full of tension and dissonance, with no agreement in sight.
Variance The town hall meeting resulted in a clear consensus on the issue at hand. Variance in opinions made it difficult to come to a decision.
Polarization The group managed to overcome their differences and find consensus. Polarization within the team led to a lack of agreement.
Disagreement Consensus was achieved after a thorough discussion among the stakeholders. Disagreement prevailed in the meeting, inhibiting any resolutions.
Dissension Dissension was set aside as the team managed to reach a consensus. The dissension among members prevented a unified decision.
Disharmony The committee worked in harmony to establish a consensus on the project. Disharmony among the group members stalled progress.
Contestation The summit concluded with a consensus on the environmental policy. Contestation erupted as differing views clashed.
Argument The council members debated at length before arriving at a consensus. The constant arguments created division instead of agreement.
Strife The team managed to resolve their differences and find consensus. Strife among the members hindered effective decision-making.
Division The assembly members came to a consensus on the city budget. Division in opinions prevented a unified stance.
Disagreement Consensus was finally achieved after hours of negotiation. The disagreement persisted throughout the meeting.
Friction The committee managed to overcome obstacles and reach a consensus. Friction between team members impeded progress.
Incompatibility The stakeholders settled on a consensus after thorough deliberation. Incompatibility in views led to a stalemate.
Separation The members of the group were able to find consensus on the issue. Separation in perspectives prevented a unified decision.
Discordance The council members unanimously reached a consensus on the bylaws. Discordance among the group members prevented any agreement.
Disagreement The committee deliberated and came to a consensus on the project plan. Lingering disagreement hindered progress on the initiative.
Dissidence Despite initial challenges, the team achieved a consensus on the policy. The continuous dissidence among members stalled progress.
Inharmony The stakeholders managed to find consensus on the critical issue. Inharmony within the group led to various opinions.
Contradiction After much discussion, the team finally reached a consensus. Contradiction of ideas prevented any agreement.
Disunity The committee worked together to establish a consensus on the initiative. Disunity among members prevented a unified decision.
Antagonism The research team achieved a consensus on the methodology to be used. Antagonism within the group slowed down decision-making.
Clash The board members found a consensus on the strategic direction of the company. A severe clash of opinions hindered any agreement.
Disagreement Despite differing perspectives, the team managed to reach a consensus. The ongoing disagreement prevented any decision from being made.
Dissent The committee members arrived at a consensus on the budget allocation. The lone dissent disrupted the agreement process.
Incongruity The team was able to find consensus regarding the project timeline. The incongruity in opinions led to confusion and no decision.
Contrary The members unanimously reached a consensus on the resolution. Their contrary views hindered progress.
Resistance The council came to a consensus on the adoption of the new policy. Strong resistance within the group led to no agreement.
Disharmony Despite challenges, the stakeholders found consensus on the issue. Disharmony in the discussions prevented mutual agreement.
Incongruence The team managed to find consensus on the best approach forward. The incongruence of opinions led to a stalemate.
Contradiction The company’s stakeholders reached a consensus on the strategic plan. Contradiction in opinions prevented any agreement.
See also  What Is The Opposite of Assisted? - Example Sentences

Outro
Antonyms of consensus, opposite of consensus and consensus ka opposite word are the same thing. In a world where opposing viewpoints challenge the notion of consensus, diversity of opinion can bring about innovation and progress. Embracing dissenting perspectives can lead to a deeper understanding of complex issues and foster creative solutions. It is through the clash of differing ideas that new insights emerge, pushing us to think critically and evolve our thinking.

While consensus seeks uniformity and agreement, embracing the opposite can lead to a richer tapestry of ideas and perspectives. Encouraging dissent allows individuals to voice their unique thoughts and contribute to a more comprehensive dialogue. By valuing the opposite of consensus, we open ourselves up to a world of possibilities and fresh approaches to solving problems.

Ultimately, the complement to consensus lies in embracing dissent and disagreement. By acknowledging and appreciating opposing viewpoints, we can create a more inclusive and dynamic environment where diverse perspectives are valued and integrated. This approach not only encourages critical thinking but also promotes growth and innovation in our ever-evolving society.