What Is The Opposite of Induction? – Example Sentences

Antonyms of induction refer to the opposite process of drawing logical conclusions based on observed patterns and data. Instead of inferring general principles from specific instances, antonyms of induction involve deriving specific conclusions from general principles or assumptions. This approach diverges from the traditional method of induction by starting with established theories or principles and applying them to draw specific outcomes or predictions.

Example Sentences With Opposite of Induction

Antonym	Sentence with Induction	Sentence with Antonym
Deduction	Based on observations and building a general conclusion	Starting with a generalization and applying it to specifics
Reasoning	Reaching a conclusion through a logical thought process	Making a decision without logical thought or reasoning
Proof	Providing evidence to support a claim	Lacking evidence to support a claim
Logic	Following a rational and coherent train of thought	Engaging in irrational and haphazard thinking
Certainty	Having a high level of confidence in a particular inference	Experiencing doubt or uncertainty in a particular inference
Validation	Confirming the accuracy or truth of a proposition	Questioning or disregarding the validity of a proposition
Verification	Ensuring that something is true or accurate	Failing to confirm that something is true or accurate
Proof	Offering sufficient evidence	Lacking substantial evidence
Clarity	Clearly stating or defining a concept	Being vague or ambiguous in defining a concept
Conviction	Holding a strong belief based on available information	Lacking a strong belief or conviction based on information
Manifestation	Displaying or showing something in a clear manner	Hiding or concealing something
Objective	Having an unbiased or neutral perspective	Having a biased or subjective perspective
Cognition	The mental process of understanding and acquiring knowledge	The lack of mental process or knowledge acquisition
Disproof	Evidence showing that a belief or theory is incorrect	Evidence supporting that a belief or theory is correct
Negation	Refusing to acknowledge a statement or belief	Agreeing with or accepting a statement or belief
Mistake	An incorrect judgment or misunderstanding of a situation	Making a correct judgment or understanding of a situation
Opposite	Being in a completely different position or direction	Being in a similar or related position or direction
Revoke	To officially cancel or nullify a decision or agreement	To officially confirm or uphold a decision or agreement
Discredit	To damage the reputation or believability of something	To strengthen or support the reputation of something
Misconception	Holding a false or incorrect understanding or belief	Having a correct or accurate understanding or belief
Discarding	Getting rid of something as unnecessary or unwanted	Retaining or keeping something as necessary or wanted
Exclusion	The act of not allowing something to be included or considered	The act of including or considering something
Introduction	The action of presenting something for the first time	The lack of doing so, keeping something from being presented
Ignorance	The lack of knowledge or awareness	Knowledgeable about a particular subject or situation
Abandonment	To leave or give up on something	To persist or continue with something
Rejection	The act of refusing or dismissing something	The act of accepting or approving something
Admittance	The act of allowing entry or access to something	The act of denying entry or access to something
Invalidation	The act of making something legally or officially invalid	The act of making something legally or officially valid
Acceptance	The act of agreeing to or approving something	The act of disagreeing with or disapproving of something
Denial	The act of rejecting or refusing a request or fact	The act of agreeing with or accepting a request or fact
Inconsistency	The state of lacking stability or agreement in principles	The state of being stable or agreeing in principles
Ignorance	Lack of awareness or understanding	Awareness or understanding of a particular subject or situation
Invalidation	The act of making something legally or officially invalid	The act of making something legally or officially valid
Rejection	The act of refusing or dismissing something	The act of accepting or approving something
Admittance	The act of allowing entry or access to something	The act of denying entry or access to something
Inclusion	The act of including or considering something	The act of not allowing something to be included or considered
Convention	The widespread belief or practice in a society	An unconventional or alternative belief or practice

More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Induction

Antonym	Sentence with Induction	Sentence with Antonym
Deduction	Induction is a method of reasoning that involves coming to a general conclusion based on specific observations.	Deduction involves reaching a specific conclusion by starting with a general principle or premise.
Ignorance	Through induction, we gain knowledge by observing patterns and making inferences.	Ignorance results from not seeking out or accepting new information or evidence through observation.
Rejection	Induction helps us embrace new ideas and concepts through a process of observation and generalization.	Rejection occurs when we refuse to acknowledge or consider new ideas or perspectives, often dismissing them without proper evaluation.
Disbelief	Induction involves learning and forming beliefs based on patterns and observations.	Disbelief is the lack of acceptance or trust in something due to a lack of evidence or conviction.
Unfamiliarity	By engaging in induction, we become familiar with patterns and concepts through observation and generalization.	Unfamiliarity arises when one lacks the knowledge or experience with certain concepts, making them seem strange or unknown.
Eschewal	Through induction, we actively seek out new information and insights by observing patterns and making generalizations.	Eschewal is the act of avoiding or shunning certain information, ideas, or activities without considering their validity or importance.
Skepticism	Induction involves the process of forming beliefs or conclusions based on observed patterns and generalizations.	Skepticism is the doubt or questioning of beliefs, ideas, or claims, often due to a lack of evidence or proof.
Unlearned	Engaging in induction allows us to gain knowledge and insight by observing patterns and making inferences.	Unlearned denotes a lack of knowledge or education in a particular subject or field, often resulting from a lack of exposure or training.
Invalidity	Induction relies on the validity of observed patterns and generalizations to draw conclusions or form beliefs.	Invalidity refers to the lack of correctness or soundness in an argument, claim, or evidence, leading to unreliable conclusions or beliefs.
Avoidance	Through induction, we actively engage in observing patterns and making inferences to gain new insights and knowledge.	Avoidance is the deliberate act of staying away from certain situations, tasks, or responsibilities without facing or addressing them.
Contradiction	Induction is a method of reasoning that involves drawing conclusions based on repeated observations and established patterns.	Contradiction occurs when statements, beliefs, or actions conflict or are inconsistent with one another, leading to confusion or doubt.
Disregard	Through induction, we pay attention to and analyze patterns and observations to gain new knowledge or insights.	Disregard is the act of ignoring or neglecting important information, opinions, or rules without considering their relevance or value.
Reversal	Through induction, we move from specific observations to general conclusions by identifying patterns and making inferences.	Reversal is the act of changing or overturning a decision, strategy, or outcome to the opposite of what was initially intended or expected.
Negation	Induction involves the process of reasoning from specific instances to make generalizations or draw conclusions.	Negation is the denial or contradiction of a statement, belief, or concept, often leading to the opposite conclusion or result.
Naivety	By engaging in induction, we develop understanding and insight by observing patterns and making inferences from specific instances.	Naivety is the lack of experience, sophistication, or understanding, often leading to gullibility or simplicity in one’s beliefs or actions.
Blindness	Induction allows us to gain insight and understanding by analyzing patterns and observations to draw general conclusions.	Blindness is the lack of perception, insight, or understanding in a particular situation, often resulting from ignorance or unwillingness to see the truth.
Avoidant	Through induction, we actively seek out knowledge and insights by observing patterns and making generalizations from specific instances.	Avoidant behavior involves the avoidance or evasion of certain people, places, or situations due to fear, discomfort, or anxiety.
Confutation	Induction is a method of reasoning that involves reaching general conclusions based on specific observations and patterns.	Confutation is the disproof or countering of an argument, theory, or belief, often showing it to be false or invalid.
Gullibility	Induction encourages critical thinking and analysis by forming conclusions based on observed patterns and specific instances.	Gullibility is the tendency to believe or accept things too easily or without sufficient evidence or critical thinking.
Nescience	Engaging in induction leads to the acquisition of knowledge and understanding by recognizing patterns and making inferences.	Nescience is the lack of knowledge or awareness about a particular topic, often resulting from a lack of exposure or interest in learning.
Hesitancy	Induction involves the process of deriving general principles from specific observations through analysis and inference.	Hesitancy is the feeling of uncertainty, reluctance, or indecision in taking action or forming opinions, often due to fear or doubt.
Exclusion	Through induction, we include and consider various observations in forming general conclusions or principles.	Exclusion is the act of leaving out or disregarding certain ideas, groups, or factors from consideration or participation.
Fallaciousness	Induction is a valid method of reasoning that relies on observed patterns and specific instances to reach general conclusions.	Fallaciousness is the quality of being deceptive, misleading, or incorrect, often resulting from flawed reasoning or false assumptions.
Repudiation	Through induction, we accept and embrace new knowledge and insights by observing patterns and making inferences.	Repudiation is the rejection or disapproval of something, often due to disagreement, opposition, or a lack of acceptance.
Inexperience	Induction allows us to gain understanding and insight by observing patterns and making generalizations based on specific instances.	Inexperience is the lack of knowledge, skill, or practice in a particular field or activity, often resulting from a lack of exposure or opportunity.
Participation	Through induction, we actively engage in the process of observing patterns and making inferences to gain knowledge and insights.	Participation involves taking part or being involved in an activity, event, or decision-making process, often contributing to a shared goal or outcome.
Equivocation	Induction is a method of reasoning that involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations and patterns.	Equivocation is the act of being intentionally ambiguous or unclear in order to mislead or avoid committing to a particular stance or position.
Unveiling	By engaging in induction, we uncover and reveal new knowledge and insights through the analysis of observed patterns and inferences.	Unveiling is the act of making something previously unknown or unseen visible or known, often leading to new discoveries or revelations.
Assertion	Induction involves forming conclusions based on observed patterns and generalizing from specific instances to make broader claims.	Assertion is the confident statement or declaration of a belief, opinion, or fact without the need for definitive proof or evidence.
Misapprehension	Through induction, we gain clarity and understanding by analyzing patterns and making inferences to draw general conclusions.	Misapprehension is the misunderstanding or misinterpretation of something, often due to a lack of information, communication, or comprehension.
Preservation	Induction allows us to grow and expand our knowledge by developing insights through the observation and analysis of patterns.	Preservation is the act of protecting, maintaining, or keeping something in its original state or condition, often to prevent damage or loss.
Antipathy	Induction fosters open-mindedness and receptivity to new ideas and information by identifying patterns and drawing general conclusions.	Antipathy is a strong feeling of dislike or aversion towards something or someone, often leading to opposition or hostility.
Misconception	Through induction, we form accurate and informed beliefs by analyzing patterns and making inferences from specific instances.	Misconception is a mistaken belief or idea about something, often resulting from a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of information.
Encounter	Induction encourages exploration and discovery by deriving general principles from specific observations and patterns.	Encounter is a meeting or experience with someone or something, often leading to an interaction or exchange of ideas, emotions, or actions.
Transparency	Through induction, we gain clarity and understanding by observing patterns and making inferences to derive general conclusions.	Transparency is the quality of being open, honest, and easily understood, often involving clear communication or lack of hidden motives.
Falsification	Induction is a reliable method of reasoning that involves making general conclusions based on specific observations and established patterns.	Falsification is the act of proving something to be false or untrue, often through evidence or reasoning that contradicts a claim or theory.
Introduction	Through induction, we expand our knowledge and insights by observing patterns and generalizing from specific instances.	Introduction is the act of presenting or bringing something new into a situation or setting, often leading to the initiation of a process or interaction.
Omission	Induction involves considering and analyzing various observations to draw general conclusions and make informed decisions.	Omission is the act of leaving out or excluding something, often leading to incomplete information or understanding.
Unveiling	By engaging in induction, we uncover and reveal new knowledge and insights through the analysis of observed patterns and inferences.	Unveiling is the act of making something previously unknown or unseen visible or known, often leading to new discoveries or revelations.
Refutation	Induction is a method of reasoning that involves reaching general conclusions based on specific observations and patterns.	Refutation is the act of proving a statement, theory, or argument to be false or invalid through evidence or counterarguments.

Outro
Antonyms of induction, opposite of induction and induction ka opposite word are the same thing. In contrast to induction, deduction involves reasoning from general principles to specific instances. By starting with established theories or premises and applying them to a particular situation, deduction allows for specific conclusions to be drawn with certainty. This method of reasoning is commonly used in mathematics, logic, and philosophy to reach logical outcomes based on sound principles.

Deduction follows a top-down approach, where the validity of the initial premises dictates the accuracy of the final conclusion. Unlike induction, which relies on observation and experimentation to form generalized principles, deduction begins with known truths and works towards specific applications. This structured process enables clear and precise reasoning, leading to decisive results that are not dependent on probability or likelihood.

In summary, deduction offers a systematic and rigorous way of reaching conclusions by utilizing established principles and logical reasoning. By moving from the general to the specific, deduction provides a reliable method for deriving accurate outcomes and drawing firm conclusions. It stands in opposition to induction’s bottom-up approach and emphasizes the importance of starting with proven truths to arrive at definitive results.