Antonyms of induction refer to the opposite process of drawing logical conclusions based on observed patterns and data. Instead of inferring general principles from specific instances, antonyms of induction involve deriving specific conclusions from general principles or assumptions. This approach diverges from the traditional method of induction by starting with established theories or principles and applying them to draw specific outcomes or predictions.
Example Sentences With Opposite of Induction
| Antonym | Sentence with Induction | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Deduction | Based on observations and building a general conclusion | Starting with a generalization and applying it to specifics |
| Reasoning | Reaching a conclusion through a logical thought process | Making a decision without logical thought or reasoning |
| Proof | Providing evidence to support a claim | Lacking evidence to support a claim |
| Logic | Following a rational and coherent train of thought | Engaging in irrational and haphazard thinking |
| Certainty | Having a high level of confidence in a particular inference | Experiencing doubt or uncertainty in a particular inference |
| Validation | Confirming the accuracy or truth of a proposition | Questioning or disregarding the validity of a proposition |
| Verification | Ensuring that something is true or accurate | Failing to confirm that something is true or accurate |
| Proof | Offering sufficient evidence | Lacking substantial evidence |
| Clarity | Clearly stating or defining a concept | Being vague or ambiguous in defining a concept |
| Conviction | Holding a strong belief based on available information | Lacking a strong belief or conviction based on information |
| Manifestation | Displaying or showing something in a clear manner | Hiding or concealing something |
| Objective | Having an unbiased or neutral perspective | Having a biased or subjective perspective |
| Cognition | The mental process of understanding and acquiring knowledge | The lack of mental process or knowledge acquisition |
| Disproof | Evidence showing that a belief or theory is incorrect | Evidence supporting that a belief or theory is correct |
| Negation | Refusing to acknowledge a statement or belief | Agreeing with or accepting a statement or belief |
| Mistake | An incorrect judgment or misunderstanding of a situation | Making a correct judgment or understanding of a situation |
| Opposite | Being in a completely different position or direction | Being in a similar or related position or direction |
| Revoke | To officially cancel or nullify a decision or agreement | To officially confirm or uphold a decision or agreement |
| Discredit | To damage the reputation or believability of something | To strengthen or support the reputation of something |
| Misconception | Holding a false or incorrect understanding or belief | Having a correct or accurate understanding or belief |
| Discarding | Getting rid of something as unnecessary or unwanted | Retaining or keeping something as necessary or wanted |
| Exclusion | The act of not allowing something to be included or considered | The act of including or considering something |
| Introduction | The action of presenting something for the first time | The lack of doing so, keeping something from being presented |
| Ignorance | The lack of knowledge or awareness | Knowledgeable about a particular subject or situation |
| Abandonment | To leave or give up on something | To persist or continue with something |
| Rejection | The act of refusing or dismissing something | The act of accepting or approving something |
| Admittance | The act of allowing entry or access to something | The act of denying entry or access to something |
| Invalidation | The act of making something legally or officially invalid | The act of making something legally or officially valid |
| Acceptance | The act of agreeing to or approving something | The act of disagreeing with or disapproving of something |
| Denial | The act of rejecting or refusing a request or fact | The act of agreeing with or accepting a request or fact |
| Inconsistency | The state of lacking stability or agreement in principles | The state of being stable or agreeing in principles |
| Ignorance | Lack of awareness or understanding | Awareness or understanding of a particular subject or situation |
| Invalidation | The act of making something legally or officially invalid | The act of making something legally or officially valid |
| Rejection | The act of refusing or dismissing something | The act of accepting or approving something |
| Admittance | The act of allowing entry or access to something | The act of denying entry or access to something |
| Inclusion | The act of including or considering something | The act of not allowing something to be included or considered |
| Convention | The widespread belief or practice in a society | An unconventional or alternative belief or practice |
More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Induction
| Antonym | Sentence with Induction | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Deduction | Induction is a method of reasoning that involves coming to a general conclusion based on specific observations. | Deduction involves reaching a specific conclusion by starting with a general principle or premise. |
| Ignorance | Through induction, we gain knowledge by observing patterns and making inferences. | Ignorance results from not seeking out or accepting new information or evidence through observation. |
| Rejection | Induction helps us embrace new ideas and concepts through a process of observation and generalization. | Rejection occurs when we refuse to acknowledge or consider new ideas or perspectives, often dismissing them without proper evaluation. |
| Disbelief | Induction involves learning and forming beliefs based on patterns and observations. | Disbelief is the lack of acceptance or trust in something due to a lack of evidence or conviction. |
| Unfamiliarity | By engaging in induction, we become familiar with patterns and concepts through observation and generalization. | Unfamiliarity arises when one lacks the knowledge or experience with certain concepts, making them seem strange or unknown. |
| Eschewal | Through induction, we actively seek out new information and insights by observing patterns and making generalizations. | Eschewal is the act of avoiding or shunning certain information, ideas, or activities without considering their validity or importance. |
| Skepticism | Induction involves the process of forming beliefs or conclusions based on observed patterns and generalizations. | Skepticism is the doubt or questioning of beliefs, ideas, or claims, often due to a lack of evidence or proof. |
| Unlearned | Engaging in induction allows us to gain knowledge and insight by observing patterns and making inferences. | Unlearned denotes a lack of knowledge or education in a particular subject or field, often resulting from a lack of exposure or training. |
| Invalidity | Induction relies on the validity of observed patterns and generalizations to draw conclusions or form beliefs. | Invalidity refers to the lack of correctness or soundness in an argument, claim, or evidence, leading to unreliable conclusions or beliefs. |
| Avoidance | Through induction, we actively engage in observing patterns and making inferences to gain new insights and knowledge. | Avoidance is the deliberate act of staying away from certain situations, tasks, or responsibilities without facing or addressing them. |
| Contradiction | Induction is a method of reasoning that involves drawing conclusions based on repeated observations and established patterns. | Contradiction occurs when statements, beliefs, or actions conflict or are inconsistent with one another, leading to confusion or doubt. |
| Disregard | Through induction, we pay attention to and analyze patterns and observations to gain new knowledge or insights. | Disregard is the act of ignoring or neglecting important information, opinions, or rules without considering their relevance or value. |
| Reversal | Through induction, we move from specific observations to general conclusions by identifying patterns and making inferences. | Reversal is the act of changing or overturning a decision, strategy, or outcome to the opposite of what was initially intended or expected. |
| Negation | Induction involves the process of reasoning from specific instances to make generalizations or draw conclusions. | Negation is the denial or contradiction of a statement, belief, or concept, often leading to the opposite conclusion or result. |
| Naivety | By engaging in induction, we develop understanding and insight by observing patterns and making inferences from specific instances. | Naivety is the lack of experience, sophistication, or understanding, often leading to gullibility or simplicity in one’s beliefs or actions. |
| Blindness | Induction allows us to gain insight and understanding by analyzing patterns and observations to draw general conclusions. | Blindness is the lack of perception, insight, or understanding in a particular situation, often resulting from ignorance or unwillingness to see the truth. |
| Avoidant | Through induction, we actively seek out knowledge and insights by observing patterns and making generalizations from specific instances. | Avoidant behavior involves the avoidance or evasion of certain people, places, or situations due to fear, discomfort, or anxiety. |
| Confutation | Induction is a method of reasoning that involves reaching general conclusions based on specific observations and patterns. | Confutation is the disproof or countering of an argument, theory, or belief, often showing it to be false or invalid. |
| Gullibility | Induction encourages critical thinking and analysis by forming conclusions based on observed patterns and specific instances. | Gullibility is the tendency to believe or accept things too easily or without sufficient evidence or critical thinking. |
| Nescience | Engaging in induction leads to the acquisition of knowledge and understanding by recognizing patterns and making inferences. | Nescience is the lack of knowledge or awareness about a particular topic, often resulting from a lack of exposure or interest in learning. |
| Hesitancy | Induction involves the process of deriving general principles from specific observations through analysis and inference. | Hesitancy is the feeling of uncertainty, reluctance, or indecision in taking action or forming opinions, often due to fear or doubt. |
| Exclusion | Through induction, we include and consider various observations in forming general conclusions or principles. | Exclusion is the act of leaving out or disregarding certain ideas, groups, or factors from consideration or participation. |
| Fallaciousness | Induction is a valid method of reasoning that relies on observed patterns and specific instances to reach general conclusions. | Fallaciousness is the quality of being deceptive, misleading, or incorrect, often resulting from flawed reasoning or false assumptions. |
| Repudiation | Through induction, we accept and embrace new knowledge and insights by observing patterns and making inferences. | Repudiation is the rejection or disapproval of something, often due to disagreement, opposition, or a lack of acceptance. |
| Inexperience | Induction allows us to gain understanding and insight by observing patterns and making generalizations based on specific instances. | Inexperience is the lack of knowledge, skill, or practice in a particular field or activity, often resulting from a lack of exposure or opportunity. |
| Participation | Through induction, we actively engage in the process of observing patterns and making inferences to gain knowledge and insights. | Participation involves taking part or being involved in an activity, event, or decision-making process, often contributing to a shared goal or outcome. |
| Equivocation | Induction is a method of reasoning that involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations and patterns. | Equivocation is the act of being intentionally ambiguous or unclear in order to mislead or avoid committing to a particular stance or position. |
| Unveiling | By engaging in induction, we uncover and reveal new knowledge and insights through the analysis of observed patterns and inferences. | Unveiling is the act of making something previously unknown or unseen visible or known, often leading to new discoveries or revelations. |
| Assertion | Induction involves forming conclusions based on observed patterns and generalizing from specific instances to make broader claims. | Assertion is the confident statement or declaration of a belief, opinion, or fact without the need for definitive proof or evidence. |
| Misapprehension | Through induction, we gain clarity and understanding by analyzing patterns and making inferences to draw general conclusions. | Misapprehension is the misunderstanding or misinterpretation of something, often due to a lack of information, communication, or comprehension. |
| Preservation | Induction allows us to grow and expand our knowledge by developing insights through the observation and analysis of patterns. | Preservation is the act of protecting, maintaining, or keeping something in its original state or condition, often to prevent damage or loss. |
| Antipathy | Induction fosters open-mindedness and receptivity to new ideas and information by identifying patterns and drawing general conclusions. | Antipathy is a strong feeling of dislike or aversion towards something or someone, often leading to opposition or hostility. |
| Misconception | Through induction, we form accurate and informed beliefs by analyzing patterns and making inferences from specific instances. | Misconception is a mistaken belief or idea about something, often resulting from a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of information. |
| Encounter | Induction encourages exploration and discovery by deriving general principles from specific observations and patterns. | Encounter is a meeting or experience with someone or something, often leading to an interaction or exchange of ideas, emotions, or actions. |
| Transparency | Through induction, we gain clarity and understanding by observing patterns and making inferences to derive general conclusions. | Transparency is the quality of being open, honest, and easily understood, often involving clear communication or lack of hidden motives. |
| Falsification | Induction is a reliable method of reasoning that involves making general conclusions based on specific observations and established patterns. | Falsification is the act of proving something to be false or untrue, often through evidence or reasoning that contradicts a claim or theory. |
| Introduction | Through induction, we expand our knowledge and insights by observing patterns and generalizing from specific instances. | Introduction is the act of presenting or bringing something new into a situation or setting, often leading to the initiation of a process or interaction. |
| Omission | Induction involves considering and analyzing various observations to draw general conclusions and make informed decisions. | Omission is the act of leaving out or excluding something, often leading to incomplete information or understanding. |
| Unveiling | By engaging in induction, we uncover and reveal new knowledge and insights through the analysis of observed patterns and inferences. | Unveiling is the act of making something previously unknown or unseen visible or known, often leading to new discoveries or revelations. |
| Refutation | Induction is a method of reasoning that involves reaching general conclusions based on specific observations and patterns. | Refutation is the act of proving a statement, theory, or argument to be false or invalid through evidence or counterarguments. |
Outro
Antonyms of induction, opposite of induction and induction ka opposite word are the same thing. In contrast to induction, deduction involves reasoning from general principles to specific instances. By starting with established theories or premises and applying them to a particular situation, deduction allows for specific conclusions to be drawn with certainty. This method of reasoning is commonly used in mathematics, logic, and philosophy to reach logical outcomes based on sound principles.
Deduction follows a top-down approach, where the validity of the initial premises dictates the accuracy of the final conclusion. Unlike induction, which relies on observation and experimentation to form generalized principles, deduction begins with known truths and works towards specific applications. This structured process enables clear and precise reasoning, leading to decisive results that are not dependent on probability or likelihood.
In summary, deduction offers a systematic and rigorous way of reaching conclusions by utilizing established principles and logical reasoning. By moving from the general to the specific, deduction provides a reliable method for deriving accurate outcomes and drawing firm conclusions. It stands in opposition to induction’s bottom-up approach and emphasizes the importance of starting with proven truths to arrive at definitive results.