What Is The Opposite of Jury? - Example Sentences

When discussing the concept of antonyms of jury, it is important to explore the contrasting roles within the legal system. A jury, typically composed of impartial individuals who weigh evidence and determine guilt or innocence, serves as a pivotal component of a trial process. In contrast, the antonyms of jury refer to the absence or exclusion of individuals who comprise a jury panel.

The term “antonyms of jury” encompasses various scenarios where a jury is not present or involved. This may include cases tried without a jury, known as bench trials, where a judge makes legal determinations. In such situations, the decision-making authority rests solely with the judge, unlike in cases with a jury. Additionally, the concept of antonyms of jury can extend to alternative dispute resolution methods, such as arbitration or mediation, where parties reach a resolution without a jury’s involvement.

Understanding the antonyms of jury provides insight into the diverse legal proceedings that exist outside the traditional jury trial framework. By recognizing the different approaches to resolving legal disputes, individuals can appreciate the significance of jury trials in the justice system and the alternatives available in certain situations.

Example Sentences With Opposite of Jury

Antonym	Sentence with Jury	Sentence with Antonym
Defendant	The jury reached a verdict of guilty.	The defendant was acquitted of all charges.
Plaintiff	The jury deliberated over the evidence.	The plaintiff was unsuccessful in their claims.
Acquittal	The jury found the defendant guilty.	The defendant did not receive an acquittal in court.
Convict	The jury decided to convict the defendant.	The accused was released as the jury did not convict them.
Prosecutor	The jury listened to the prosecutor’s case.	The prosecutor presented the case against the accused.
Guilt	The jury found him guilty of the crime.	The innocence of the accused was established by the jury.
Evidence	The jury based their decision on evidence.	The lack of evidence led to a mistrial.
Verdict	The jury announced a verdict of not guilty.	The absence of a verdict left the case unresolved.
Accused	The jury heard testimony from the accused.	The accused was not found guilty by the jury.
Innocent	The jury declared him innocent.	The absence of evidence rendered him guilty.
Judge	The jury followed the judge’s instructions.	The judge presided over the court proceedings.
Sentencing	The jury decided on the length of the sentence.	The judge is responsible for sentencing the defendant.
Mistrial	The jury was unable to reach a decision.	The mistrial was declared due to jury misconduct.
Witness	The jury listened to the witness testimony.	The reliability of the witness was questioned.
Appeal	The jury reached a final decision.	The defendant intends to file an appeal.
Oath	The jury swore to deliver a fair verdict.	The omission of the oath raised concerns about bias.
Testimony	The jury considered the witness testimony.	The credibility of his testimony was scrutinized.
Final	The jury reached a final decision.	The initial deliberations of the jury were inconclusive.
Unanimous	The jury came to a unanimous decision.	The lack of unanimous agreement led to a mistrial.
Misconduct	The jury was dismissed due to misconduct.	Integrity is key to avoid misconduct during a trial.
Fairness	The jury was instructed to act with fairness.	A lack of fairness in the legal proceedings was evident.
Impartial	The jury was reminded to remain impartial.	The biased juror was incapable of being impartial.
Objective	The jury assessed the evidence objectively.	Emotional bias made it difficult to be objective.
Indictment	The jury decided on the indictment.	The lack of an indictment led to the case being dropped.
Sustain	The jury was able to sustain the objection.	The objection was overruled as the jury couldn’t sustain it.
Overturn	The jury was unable to overturn the ruling.	The defendant’s lawyer managed to overturn the decision.
Acquit	The jury deliberated and decided to acquit.	The decision to acquit did not sit well with the victim.
Partiality	The jury was warned against partiality.	The presence of partiality compromised the verdict.
Mistake	The jury made a mistake in their decision.	The absence of mistake was evident in the jury’s verdict.
Injustice	The jury aimed to prevent any injustice.	The verdict was seen as an act of injustice by many.
Veracity	The jury questioned the veracity of the witness.	The witness’s veracity was deemed questionable.
Accusation	The jury heard the accusation against him.	The lack of evidence led to the accusation being dismissed.
Impose	The jury was required to impose a sentence.	A decision was made not to impose any penalties.
Validate	The jury validated the evidence presented.	The lack of validation led to doubts about the evidence.
Pardon	The jury recommended a pardon for the accused.	The decision was made not to grant a pardon to the convict.
Commutation	The jury discussed the commutation of the sentence.	The judge decided against commutation in this case.

More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Jury

Antonym	Sentence with Jury	Sentence with Antonym
Plaintiff	The jury delivered a verdict in favor of the defendant.	The plaintiff presented their case in court.
Judge	The jury was responsible for determining the verdict.	The judge presided over the court proceedings.
Acquittal	The jury found the defendant guilty of the crime.	The defendant received conviction after the trial.
Prosecution	The jury heard arguments from both the defense and prosecution.	The defense attorney presented evidence in court.
Defendant	The jury will decide whether the defendant is guilty.	The prosecution made a case against the defendant.
Conviction	The jury unanimously agreed on a guilty verdict.	The defendant was acquitted of all charges, no conviction.
Innocent	The jury must determine if the defendant is guilty.	The defendant is innocent until proven otherwise.
Attorney	The jury listened to the arguments presented by both attorneys.	The defendant hired a skilled attorney for the case.
Verdict	The jury reached a final verdict after deliberation.	There was no verdict as the case was dismissed.
Accuse	The jury will hear the evidence before the defendant is accused.	The defendant was not accused of any crime.
Guilty	The jury found the defendant guilty of the charges.	The defendant was declared not guilty by the jury.
Evidence	The jury considered all the evidence before deciding.	The lack of evidence led to an inconclusive case.
Convict	The jury may convict the defendant with a guilty verdict.	The accused was not convicted due to lack of evidence.
Testimony	The jury listened to the testimony of the witnesses.	The lack of testimony weakened the case for the prosecution.
Defense	The jury must weigh the arguments of both the prosecution and defense.	The defendant’s defense lawyer presented a strong case.
Indictment	The jury delivered an indictment against the suspect.	The lack of evidence led to the dismissal of the indictment.
Prosecute	The jury listened to the arguments as the prosecution attempted to prosecute the case.	The decision not to prosecute led to the case being dropped.
Testify	Witnesses were called to testify in front of the jury.	The witness refused to testify during the court proceedings.
Conviction	The jury found the defendant guilty and a conviction was made.	The absence of evidence led to a lack of conviction in the case.
Felon	The jury deliberated on the charges against the felon.	The charges were dropped, resulting in no felon being charged.
Accusation	The jury considered the strength of the accusation.	The lack of accusation meant the case was weakened.
Defenseless	The defendant felt defenseless without a lawyer during the trial.	The strong defense presented by the attorney helped the defendant.
Prosecution	The jury listened to both sides as the prosecution made its case.	The decision not to move forward with prosecution was made.
Criminal	The jury deliberated on the guilt of the criminal.	The person was found not to be a criminal by the jury.
Punish	The jury must decide the appropriate punishment for the guilty party.	The defendant was not found guilty and therefore not punished.
Clear	The jury made it clear that the defendant was guilty.	The lack of evidence made it clear that the defendant was innocent.
Charge	The jury heard the details of each charge brought against the defendant.	The defendant was found not guilty on every single charge.
Judge	The jury was responsible for deciding, not the judge.	The judge made the final decision instead of the jury.
Mistrial	The jury was dismissed, and a mistrial was declared.	The trial continued without any issues, avoiding a mistrial.
Culpable	The jury found the defendant culpable for the crime.	The defendant was found not to be culpable in the court case.
Exonerate	The jury had the power to exonerate the accused.	The accused was not exonerated due to lack of evidence.
Prosecution	The prosecution presented a strong case to the jury.	The decision was made not to go forward with the prosecution.
Fact	The jury based their decision on the presented facts.	The lack of facts led to an inconclusive decision.
Brings	The trial brings together the prosecution, defense, and the jury.	The lack of evidence brings doubt into the minds of the jurors.
Declare	The jury must declare a verdict after deliberation.	Without evidence, it was difficult to declare the defendant guilty.
Innocence	The defendant maintained their innocence throughout the trial.	The jury found the defendant guilty, stripping away their innocence.

Outro
Antonyms of jury, opposite of jury and jury ka opposite word are the same thing. In contrast to a jury, which consists of a group of individuals who make decisions based on evidence presented in a court case, a judge acts as a single authority figure responsible for interpreting and applying the law. While a jury represents a diverse range of perspectives and opinions, a judge is tasked with ensuring impartiality and upholding legal standards throughout the trial process.

Ultimately, the role of a judge is to preside over court proceedings, evaluate evidence, instruct the jury on legal matters, and deliver a final verdict based on the law. In contrast, a jury deliberates collectively to reach a decision on the guilt or innocence of the accused. Both components, the judge, and the jury, play crucial roles in the criminal justice system to ensure fair and just trials for all individuals involved.

In conclusion, while a jury and a judge serve distinct functions within the legal system, both are essential in safeguarding the principles of justice and fairness. The collaboration between judges and juries helps maintain the integrity of the judicial process and uphold the rights of defendants and plaintiffs alike.