Subjective and objective are antonyms, representing two contrasting approaches to analyzing and interpreting information. The term “antonyms of objective” refers to opinions, feelings, or interpretations that are based on personal perspective, emotions, or experiences rather than verifiable facts or evidence.
In a subjective viewpoint, individuals rely on their own beliefs, biases, and values to shape their understanding of a situation, concept, or issue. This approach is inherently influenced by personal experiences, emotions, and prejudices, making it subjective and potentially different from person to person.
Conversely, the objective perspective aims to be impartial, factual, and unbiased, focusing on observable data, evidence, and logical reasoning to draw conclusions. An objective analysis typically prioritizes accuracy and neutrality, minimizing the impact of personal opinions or emotions on the interpretation of information.
Example Sentences With Opposite of Objective
| Antonym | Sentence with Objective | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective | The research was objective and based on facts. | The decision was subjective and influenced by personal opinions. |
| Biased | The reporter tried to be objective in the article. | The judge’s ruling was clearly biased in favor of one party. |
| Partial | It is important to maintain an objective viewpoint in the debate. | The jury’s decision seemed quite partial towards the defendant. |
| Prejudiced | The investigator must stay objective while gathering evidence. | His remarks were clearly prejudiced against certain ethnic groups. |
| Intuitive | The findings of the study were based on objective data. | She relied on her intuitive feelings rather than objective facts. |
| Biased | It is crucial for the board to be objective in their decision. | The company’s CEO was perceived as biased in his decision-making process. |
| Opinionated | The journalist tried to remain objective in reporting the news. | The editor was too opinionated, often injecting personal views into articles. |
| Partisan | The judge must ensure an objective hearing for all parties. | The committee’s decision seemed clearly partisan and favoring one side. |
| Emotional | The scientist’s analysis was factual and objective. | Her response was purely emotional, lacking any basis in logic or reason. |
| One-sided | The report presented an objective view of the situation. | His argument was one-sided and did not take other perspectives into account. |
| Biased | The professor aimed to maintain an objective stance in the lecture. | Her review of the book was clearly biased and did not consider its merits fairly. |
| Impartial | It is important for the judge to remain objective in the trial. | The arbitrator’s decision appeared quite impartial and fair to both parties. |
| Unprejudiced | It is necessary to have an objective evaluation of the situation. | The manager’s actions were clearly unprejudiced and based on merit alone. |
| Nonpartisan | The committee tried to make an objective decision. | The political party’s position was clearly nonpartisan and aimed at pleasing all members. |
| Neutral | The mediator remained objective during the negotiation. | His friend’s comments seemed somewhat neutral and did not take a stand on the issue. |
| Impartial | The journalist strived to present an objective view of the events. | The critic’s review seemed far from impartial, clearly favoring one artist over another. |
| Fair-minded | A doctor should always be objective when diagnosing a patient. | He was far from fair-minded when distributing tasks, often playing favorites. |
| Dispassionate | An objective analysis is crucial in making informed decisions. | Her arguments were far from dispassionate, filled with emotion and personal attacks. |
| Neutral | The board should take an objective stance on the matter. | Her position seemed far from neutral, clearly favoring one side over the other. |
| Equitable | The assessment should be based on objective criteria. | His actions were certainly not equitable, showing favoritism and unfairness. |
More Example Sentences With Antonyms Of Objective
| Antonym | Sentence with Objective | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective | The report provided factual information. | The report included personal opinions. |
| Biased | The study was conducted in an impartial manner. | The results were influenced by prejudice. |
| Partial | The evaluation was done in an unbiased manner. | The judgment was made with a preference. |
| Unprejudiced | The decision was based on facts and evidence. | The decision was based on preconceived notions. |
| Impartial | The jury delivered an impartial verdict. | The judge showed favoritism throughout the trial. |
| Subject | The news article presented an objective analysis. | The news article presented a subjective perspective. |
| Opinionated | The documentary provided an objective viewpoint. | The documentary was very opinionated in its approach. |
| Partiality | The review was free from any bias. | The review reflected a strong partiality towards a side. |
| Nonpartisan | The committee needs to remain unbiased. | The committee should not be nonpartisan in their decisions. |
| Slanted | The article provided an unbiased view of the situation. | The article gave a slanted portrayal of the events. |
| Unbiased | The evaluation was conducted in a fair manner. | The evaluation was conducted in an unbiased manner. |
| Neutral | The journalist maintained an objective stance. | The journalist did not take a neutral position. |
| Prejudiced | The investigation was carried out with fairness. | The investigation was tainted by prejudiced views. |
| Partial | The referee made an impartial decision. | The referee showed a partial attitude towards one team. |
| Nonobjective | The report was based on facts and evidence. | The report was based on nonobjective criteria. |
| Biased | His views were objective and well-reasoned. | His views were biased and influenced by personal beliefs. |
| Partisan | The news coverage presented an objective account. | The news coverage was highly partisan and one-sided. |
| Opinionated | The discussion was factual and unbiased. | The discussion was filled with opinionated remarks. |
| Fair-minded | The judge strives to be neutral and objective. | The judge is known for being fair-minded and just. |
| One-sided | The debate included various perspectives. | The debate was one-sided and lacked diversity. |
| Impartial | The mediator was neutral and unbiased. | The mediator showed partial behavior during the dispute. |
| Entrenched | He approached the issue with an open mind. | He approached the issue with an entrenched viewpoint. |
| Unprejudiced | The analysis was fact-based and objective. | The analysis was influenced by unprejudiced views. |
| Personalized | The recommendations were impartial and fair. | The recommendations were personalized and favoring one party. |
| Object | The article was written in a clear and factual way. | The article was written to object to the established facts. |
| Polarized | The discussion was balanced and free from bias. | The discussion was polarized, with extreme viewpoints. |
| Arbitrator | The neutral third party resolved the conflict. | The partisan arbitrator favored one side over the other. |
| Rational | She made decisions based on logic and evidence. | She let her emotions override rational thinking. |
| Lopsided | The assessment was thorough and balanced. | The assessment was flawed and lopsided in its approach. |
| Even-handed | The manager tries to be neutral in his decisions. | The manager is known for making even-handed judgments. |
| Fair | The investigation was impartial and fair. | The investigation was anything but fair and equitable. |
| Unbiased | The journalist presented an objective viewpoint. | The journalist failed to remain unbiased in the article. |
| Favoring | The report was done in an unbiased manner. | The report was done favoring one side of the argument. |
| Neutral | The expert provided an objective analysis. | The expert did not take a neutral stance in his evaluation. |
| Objective | The survey results were interpreted in an impartial manner. | The survey results were interpreted in a subjective manner. |
| Balanced | The presentation included multiple perspectives. | The presentation was not balanced as it only focused on one side. |
| Unprejudiced | The summary was based on factual information. | The summary was influenced by unprejudiced feelings. |
| Impartial | The judge was unbiased in his decision. | The judge was impartial and treated both parties fairly. |
| Biased | The study was conducted in an objective manner. | The results were influenced by biased views. |
| Partisan | The discussion was based on verifiable facts. | The discussion was highly partisan and subjective. |
Outro
Antonyms of objective, opposite of objective and objective ka opposite word are the same thing. In conclusion, the subjective nature of perspectives allows for a deeper understanding and empathy in our interactions with others. Embracing subjectivity enables us to recognize the diverse experiences and emotions that shape individuals’ perceptions, fostering connection and mutual respect. By acknowledging subjectivity, we can navigate complex situations with sensitivity and open-mindedness, leading to more harmonious relationships and effective communication.
Moreover, subjectivity encourages introspection and self-awareness, prompting us to explore our own biases, values, and motivations. This inner reflection facilitates personal growth and a greater appreciation for the complexities of human nature. Embracing subjectivity invites a willingness to challenge assumptions and embrace ambiguity, paving the way for continuous learning and development.
Ultimately, embracing subjectivity offers a more holistic and compassionate approach to understanding the world around us. It challenges us to embrace diversity, empathy, and introspection as essential tools for navigating the complexities of human interactions and experiences. By valuing subjectivity, we can cultivate deeper connections, foster mutual understanding, and navigate life’s challenges with empathy and grace.